Go to Vaniquotes | Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanimedia


Vanisource - the complete essence of Vedic knowledge


701205 - Conversation B - Indore: Difference between revisions

 
m (Text replacement - "#ff9933" to "#ec710e")
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Conversations and Lectures with Hindi Snippets]]
[[Category:1970 - Conversations]]
[[Category:1970 - Conversations]]
[[Category:1970 - Lectures and Conversations]]
[[Category:1970 - Lectures and Conversations]]
Line 8: Line 9:
[[Category:Lectures, Conversations and Letters - India, Indore]]
[[Category:Lectures, Conversations and Letters - India, Indore]]
[[Category:Audio Files 30.01 to 45.00 Minutes]]
[[Category:Audio Files 30.01 to 45.00 Minutes]]
[[Category:Miscellaneous New Audios and Transcriptions - Released in June 2019]]
[[Category:Miscellaneous New Audio and Transcriptions - Released in June 2019]]
<div style="float:left">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=Category:Conversations - by Date]]'''[[:Category:Conversations - by Date|Conversations by Date]], [[:Category:1970 - Conversations|1970]]'''</div>
<div style="float:left">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=Category:Conversations - by Date]]'''[[:Category:Conversations - by Date|Conversations by Date]], [[:Category:1970 - Conversations|1970]]'''</div>
{{RandomImage}}
{{RandomImage}}




Devotee: Śrīla Prabhupāda invited at Baba Bal Mukund and Vairāgya-bhava Mahārāja, had come to Indore from Bombay. On 3rd of December and he delivered lectures. The last two lectures recorded in the morning of the fourth and fifth. At the Gītā Bhavan in Indore and the last speaking was kīrtana (?) then in the room of Baba Bal Mukund. At the Gītā Bhavan and just after the lecture on the fifth. Present now with His Divine Grace in Indore just now, Himāvatī and Hansadutta and Revatīnandana das brahmacārī.
<div class="lec_code">701205R2-Indore - December 05, 1970 - 44:46 Minutes</div>


Prabhupāda: ...(indistinct). I am willing give me this nice foodstuff into my mouth. That means the part and parcel is healthy when he gives service to the whole body. Similarly, because you are part and parcel of...


(break) ...that is your (indistinct). You'll have. You can adopt any other process. Suppose the finger catches one sweetmeat, if you think, if the finger thinks that we are puzzled why shall I give it to the stomach? Let me enjoy. It will not be able to enjoy. It will simply spoil.
<mp3player>https://s3.amazonaws.com/vanipedia/full/1970/701205R2-INDORE.mp3</mp3player>


Similarly we part and parcel..., the karmīs, they are trying to enjoy themselves in this world. So their mistake. They cannot enjoy, therefore they are unhappy here. The jñānīs they are rejecting this world, brahma satyaṁ jagan mithyā. So it is the hands business to take a sweetmeat and if it is robbed for personal enjoyment, it is waste of time. It will gives us, so I cannot enjoy therefore I stick to this, thrown away. That is not limited. But if the finger takes it and gives it to the stomach that is its real duty.
 
'''Devotee:''' Śrīla Prabhupāda invited at Baba Bal Mukund and Vairāgya-bhava Mahārāja, had come to Indore from Bombay. On 3rd of December and he delivered lectures. The last two lectures recorded in the morning of the fourth and fifth. At the Gītā Bhavan in Indore and the last speaking was ''kīrtana'' then in the room of Baba Bal Mukund. At the Gītā Bhavan and just after the lecture on the fifth. Present now with His Divine Grace in Indore just now, Himāvatī and Hansadutta and Revatīnandana das ''brahmacārī''.
 
'''Prabhupāda:''' (indistinct) . . . I am willing give me this nice foodstuff into my mouth. That means the part and parcel is healthy when he gives service to the whole body. Similarly, because you are part and parcel of . . .
 
(break) . . . that is your . . . (indistinct) . . . you'll have. You can adopt any other process. Suppose the finger catches one sweetmeat, if you think, if the finger thinks that we are puzzled why shall I give it to the stomach? Let me enjoy. It will not be able to enjoy. It will simply spoil.
 
Similarly we part and parcel . . . the ''karmīs'', they are trying to enjoy themselves in this world. So their mistake. They cannot enjoy, therefore they are unhappy here. The ''jñānīs'' they are rejecting this world, ''brahma satyaṁ jagan mithyā''. So it is the hands business to take a sweetmeat and if it is robbed for personal enjoyment, it is waste of time. It will gives us, so I cannot enjoy therefore I stick to this, thrown away. That is not limited. But if the finger takes it and gives it to the stomach that is its real duty.


Similarly if you want to enjoy this world that is mistake. If you want to renounce this world, that is mistake. If you take this world for service of the Lord—that is enjoyment.
Similarly if you want to enjoy this world that is mistake. If you want to renounce this world, that is mistake. If you take this world for service of the Lord—that is enjoyment.


So what is your question about this? Mātājī boliye (Hindi). Do you follow what I said?
So what is your question about this? <span style="color:#ec710e">Mātājī boliye.</span> <span style="color:#128807">(Yes, mataji you can ask.)</span> Did you follow what I said?


Mātājī:(indistinct)
'''Mātājī:''' . . . (indistinct)


Prabhupāda: Eh?
'''Prabhupāda:''' Eh?


Mātājī:(indistinct)
'''Mātājī:''' . . . (indistinct)


Prabhupāda: Ah. So.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Ah. So.


Indian (1): My question actually is about this thing.
'''Indian (1):''' My question actually is about this thing.


Prabhupāda: Yes.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes.


Indian (1): Therefore as we grow old, service towards God.
'''Indian (1):''' Therefore as we grow old, service towards God.


Prabhupāda: Yes.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes.


Indian (1): (indistinct)
'''Indian (1):''' . . . (indistinct)


Prabhupāda: Lul.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Lul.


Indian (1): Lul.
'''Indian (1):''' Lul.


Prabhupāda: Yes.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes.


Indian (1): And in that way he becomes too much selfish, in full.
'''Indian (1):''' And in that way he becomes too much selfish, in full.


Prabhupāda: No, no that is not selfish.
'''Prabhupāda:''' No, no that is not selfish.


Indian (1): (indistinct)
'''Indian (1):''' . . . (indistinct)


Prabhupāda: No, you do not..., you did not understand. If we say there is a story parāṇy indriyāna in Hitopadeśa. That the senses of the body they made a strike. That the stomach is eating simply and we are working. The leg said, "Oh I am walking," the hands said that, "I am doing this." The finger said, "I am." All the senses, just like now a days there is strike. So there was a strike they failed to fill the stomach. But the result was gradually they became weak.  
'''Prabhupāda:''' No, you do not . . . you did not understand. If we say there is a story ''parāṇy indriyāna'' in ''Hitopadeśa''. That the senses of the body they made a strike. That the stomach is eating simply and we are working. The leg said, "Oh I am walking," the hands said that, "I am doing this." The finger said, "I am." All the senses, just like now a days there is strike. So there was a strike they failed to fill the stomach. But the result was gradually they became weak.


The next conference on the matter, "Why you are becoming weak." Then they found that the only reason is that we did not serve the stomach. So let us again begin to serve the stomach. They become happy. Similarly the whole modern civilisation has revolted against God, so that become (indistinct). If there is a relut(?) again to serve God, they will be happy. Otherwise there is no happiness. There is no peace.
The next conference on the matter, "Why you are becoming weak." Then they found that the only reason is that we did not serve the stomach. So let us again begin to serve the stomach. They become happy. Similarly the whole modern civilisation has revolted against God, so that becoming . . . (indistinct) . . . if there is a relut again to serve God, they will be happy. Otherwise there is no happiness. There is no peace.


Indian (1): Swami I have been to that (indistinct) Nagar. I met also some representatives of (indistinct) They told me then I asked him what makes you to come over here. Some thousand miles from their country. They told me that is a lot of disappointment in our country. I said (indistinct). Just in their own (indistinct)
'''Indian (1):''' Swami I have been told to that . . . (indistinct) . . . nagar. I metsome other representatives of . . . (indistinct) . . . they told me then I asked him what makes you to come over here. Some thousand miles from their country. They told me that is a lot of disappointment in our country. I said . . . (indistinct) . . . these people. Are they actually covering what we want to teach, do our philosophy or they have simply have come . . . just in their own . . . (indistinct)


Prabhupāda: But do you know your philosophy? You want to know but do you know what is your philosophy?
'''Prabhupāda:''' But do you know your philosophy? You want to know but do you know what is your philosophy?


Indian (1): We have lost the spiritual. The spiritual (indistinct).
'''Indian (1):''' We have lost the spiritual. The spiritually . . . (indistinct)


Prabhupāda: Who?
'''Prabhupāda:''' Who?


Indian (1): (indistinct) what Gītā is.
'''Indian (1):''' (indistinct) . . . what ''Gītā'' is.


Prabhupāda: Yes. Do you understand the Gītā?  
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes. Do you understand the ''Gītā''?


Indian (1): No I don't.
'''Indian (1):''' No I don't.


Prabhupāda: Then?
'''Prabhupāda:''' Then?


Indian (1): Nobody can claim to understand it. We came to just try to understand it.
'''Indian (1):''' Nobody can claim to understand it. We came to just try to understand it.


Prabhupāda: Then how you will be taught? Talking on the Bhagavad-gītā if you do not understand it?
'''Prabhupāda:''' Then how you will be taught? Talking on the ''Bhagavad-gītā'' if you do not understand it?


Indian (1): (indistinct)
'''Indian (1):''' . . . (indistinct)


Prabhupāda: Ah. So this is the point. That you cannot be aloof from the service of the Lord. If you do that then you will suffer. But if you be engaged in the transcendental loving service of the Lord, then you will be happy. This is the philosophy. Now if you do not understand this philosophy. I have already given you the example. Now what is your saying? What do you want to say about this things?
'''Prabhupāda:''' Ah. So this is the point. That you cannot be aloof from the service of the Lord. If you do that then you will suffer. But if you be engaged in the transcendental loving service of the Lord, then you will be happy. This is the philosophy. Now if you do not understand this philosophy. I have already given you the example. Now what is your saying? What do you want to say about this things?


Indian (1): Swamiji. It is your own philosophy then one must sit down (indistinct) a particular (indistinct).
'''Indian (1):''' Swamiji. It is your own philosophy then one must sit down . . . (indistinct) . . . a particular . . . (indistinct)


Prabhupāda: No, no I sit down. You have to give service to the Lord, where is the question of sit down? Why do you say like that?
'''Prabhupāda:''' No, no why sit down. You have to give service to the Lord, where is the question of sit down? Why do you say like that?


Indian (1): (indistinct) these things (indistinct) service to the God.
'''Indian (1):''' (indistinct) . . . these things . . . (indistinct) . . . service to the God.


Prabhupāda: Why not? If I say that you do this, all my disciples are doing. You do this, they are doing. That is service.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Why not? If I say that you do this, all my disciples are doing. You do this, they are doing. That is service.


Indian (1): So we can't take ourselves (indistinct) representative of God. We can do what the God (indistinct)
'''Indian (1):''' So we can't take ourselves . . . (indistinct) . . . representative of God. We can do what the God . . . (indistinct)


Prabhupāda: What you mean by representative of God? Do you know who is representative of God?
'''Prabhupāda:''' What you mean by representative of God? Do you know who is representative of God?


Indian (1): Nobody. We are all people others are either nobody (indistinct)
'''Indian (1):''' Nobody. We are everybody others are either nobody . . . (indistinct)


Prabhupāda: Do you know what is the meaning of representative?
'''Prabhupāda:''' Do you know what is the meaning of representative?


Indian (1): Representative means what God expects or what our...
'''Indian (1):''' Representative means what God expects or what our . . .


Prabhupāda: What God expects, you know?
'''Prabhupāda:''' What God expects, you know?


Indian (1): God expects that we should be so much vigil. We should be of certain nature, if we can, we can do or follow our own soul we can be. We can try to become nearer to God by our good doings and we should not be so much…
'''Indian (1):''' God expects that we should be so much vigil. We should be of certain nature, if we can, we can do or follow our own soul we can be. We can try to become nearer to God by our good doings and we should not be so much . . .


Prabhupāda: What is your good doings?
'''Prabhupāda:''' What is your good doings?


Indian (1): Good doings?
'''Indian (1):''' Good doings?


Prabhupāda: What do you mean by good doings?
'''Prabhupāda:''' What do you mean by good doings?


Indian (1): Not to hurt others.
'''Indian (1):''' Not to hurt others.


Prabhupāda: Then why you are killing animals?
'''Prabhupāda:''' Then why you are killing animals?


Indian (1): We do not.
'''Indian (1):''' We do not.


Prabhupāda: Why don't you struggle. Give service to the Lord. At least you do something for God.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Why don't you struggle. Give service to the Lord. At least you do something for God.


Indian (1): I don't take meat.
'''Indian (1):''' I don't take meat.


Prabhupāda: You don't take meat but if you think that animals should not be. Slaughtered, if you do not understand any other philosophy, you can stop it. You can try. That is a struggle. Now to representative, to become representative of God you say that. You cannot say that you are representative of God. That was only (indistinct). So whom do you accept as representative of God?
'''Prabhupāda:''' You don't take meat but if you think that animals should not be. Slaughtered, if you do not understand any other philosophy, you can stop it. You can try. That is a struggle. Now to representative, to become representative of God you say that. You cannot say that you are representative of God. That was only . . . (indistinct) . . . so whom do you accept as representative of God?


Indian (1): Simply given(?) (indistinct) God is the representative.
'''Indian (1):''' Simply given . . . (indistinct) . . . God is the representative.


Prabhupāda: Then how do you say, that you cannot claim yourself as representative.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Then how do you say, that you cannot claim yourself as representative.


Indian (1): It is not you! It is not you! You (indistinct) nobody can claim.
'''Indian (1):''' It is not you! It is not you! You . . . (indistinct) . . . nobody can claim.


Prabhupāda: That's all right. Why one does not claim? Why one cannot claim as representative of God? What is the reason?
'''Prabhupāda:''' That's all right. Why one does not claim? Why one cannot claim as representative of God? What is the reason?


Indian (1): Even God doesn't claim that he reveals God. Why you should claim that you are representative of God?
'''Indian (1):''' Even God doesn't claim that he reveals God. Why you should claim that you are representative of God?


Prabhupāda: Who? Who is that God? Who says, "I am not God." Who has done that?
'''Prabhupāda:''' Who? Who is that God? Who says: "I am not God." Who has done that?


Indian (1): Nobody says, "I am God."
'''Indian (1):''' Nobody says that, "I am God."


Prabhupāda: Eh?
'''Prabhupāda:''' Eh?


Prabhupāda: Nobody says, "I am God."
'''Prabhupāda:''' Nobody says: "I am God."


Prabhupāda: Nobody says—but Kṛṣṇa says.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Nobody says—but Kṛṣṇa says.


Indian (1): Kṛṣṇa. Kṛṣṇa has told a different meaning.
'''Indian (1):''' Kṛṣṇa. Kṛṣṇa has told a different meaning.


Prabhupāda: Eh?
'''Prabhupāda:''' Eh?


Indian (1): Kṛṣṇa…
'''Indian (1):''' Kṛṣṇa . . .


Prabhupāda: Do you know that meaning?
'''Prabhupāda:''' Do you know that meaning?


Indian (1): He said about the karma.
'''Indian (1):''' He said about the ''karma''.


Prabhupāda: What does he say? What does he say? Just quote from Bhagavad-gītā.
'''Prabhupāda:''' What does he say? What does he say? Just quote from ''Bhagavad-gītā''.


Indian (1): He, He, He, He may claim to be God but you are so angry to be representative.
'''Indian (1):''' He, He, He, He may claim to be God but you are so angry to be representative.


Prabhupāda: Why not?
'''Prabhupāda:''' Why not?


Indian (1): Tell you?
'''Indian (1):''' Tell you?


Prabhupāda: Yes. You do not know. You do not know.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes. You do not know. You do not know.


Indian (1): (indistinct)
'''Indian (1):''' . . . (indistinct)


Prabhupāda Yes. He said
Prabhupāda Yes. He said


:''na ca tasmān manuṣyeṣu''
:''na ca tasmān manuṣyeṣu''
:''kaścin me priya-kṛttamaḥ . ''
:''kaścin me priya-kṛttamaḥ''
([[BG 18.69 (1972)|BG 18.69]])
:([[BG 18.69 (1972)|BG 18.69]])
 
(There is no servant in this world more dear to Me than he, nor will there ever be one more dear.)
 
Whoever teaches the philosophy of Bhagavad-gītā. Nobody is dearer than him. Therefore he is representative.
 
Devotee: Sarva-dharmān parityajya.


Prabhupāda: Mām ekaṁśaraṇaṁ.  
Whoever teaches the philosophy of ''Bhagavad-gītā''. Nobody is dearer than him. Therefore he is representative.
([[BG 18.66 (1972)|BG 18.66]])


:(Abandon all varieties of religion and just surrender unto Me. I shall deliver you from all sinful reaction. Do not fear.)
'''Devotee:''' ''Sarva-dharmān parityajya''.


So Kṛṣṇa says, sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁśaraṇaṁ vraja—and we are preaching. Sarva-dharmān parityajya—you just become Kṛṣṇa conscious. So are you not representative? Are you not speaking on behalf of Kṛṣṇa?
'''Prabhupāda:''' ''Mām ekaṁśaraṇaṁ''. ([[BG 18.66 (1972)|BG 18.66]])


Indian (1): Yes.
So Kṛṣṇa says, ''sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁśaraṇaṁ vraja''—and we are preaching. ''Sarva-dharmān parityajya''—you just become Kṛṣṇa conscious. So are you not representative? Are you not speaking on behalf of Kṛṣṇa?


Prabhupāda: Then you have to agree. Representative means who speaks on behalf of Kṛṣṇa. He is representative.
'''Indian (1):''' Yes.


Indian (1): And one who follows.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Then you have to agree. Representative means who speaks on behalf of Kṛṣṇa. He is representative.


Prabhupāda: He is also representative. So just clear the idea who is representative. Everything is there in the Bhagavad-gītā. Unfortunately busy, we do not read it carefully. Kṛṣṇa says: sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁśaraṇaṁ vraja. Anyone who preaches this philosophy, he is representative of Kṛṣṇa.
'''Indian (1):''' And one who follows.


Devotee: Ahaṁ tvāṁ sarva-pāpebhyo mokṣayiṣyāmi māśucaḥ.  
'''Prabhupāda:''' He is also representative. So just clear the idea who is representative. Everything is there in the ''Bhagavad-gītā''. Unfortunately busy, we do not read it carefully. Kṛṣṇa says: ''sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁśaraṇaṁ vraja''. Anyone who preaches this philosophy, he is representative of Kṛṣṇa.


Prabhupāda: That you become Kṛṣṇa conscious, you will be happy. He is representative.
'''Devotee:''' ''Ahaṁ tvāṁ sarva-pāpebhyo mokṣayiṣyāmi māśucaḥ''.


Devotee: Yes.
'''Prabhupāda:''' That you become Kṛṣṇa conscious, you will be happy. He is representative.


Prabhupāda: It is not very difficult task to become representative of Kṛṣṇa or God. Simply you have to act. So all these boys and girls who are preaching Kṛṣṇa consciousness, they are all representatives of Kṛṣṇa. Because they are speaking the same thing. Suppose if I say, "I want a glass of water." And if some of you goes immediately, "Oh Swamiji wants a glass of water." Then you are the principal. You immediately take my interest. He is thirsty, immediately one glass of water should be supplied to him. That is my interest becomes your interest. Therefore you are representative. As soon as you take my interest, as your interest. Immediately you are representative.
'''Devotee:''' Yes.


Indian (2): You become (indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' It is not very difficult task to become representative of Kṛṣṇa or God. Simply you have to act. So all these boys and girls who are preaching Kṛṣṇa consciousness, they are all representatives of Kṛṣṇa. Because they are speaking the same thing. Suppose if I say: "I want a glass of water." And if some of you goes immediately, "Oh Swamiji wants a glass of water." Then you are the principal. You immediately take my interest. He is thirsty, immediately one glass of water should be supplied to him. That is my interest becomes your interest. Therefore you are representative. As soon as you take my interest, as your interest. Immediately you are representative.


Prabhupāda: Eh?
'''Indian (2):''' You become . . . (indistinct)


Indian (2): You become (indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' Eh?


Prabhupāda: That is representative. This is intelligence. We have to know what God wants. And if we act according to that then we are representative. Not that God has to come here and give you a certificate, "Oh this is, this man is my representative." You are already representative, sarvataḥ pāṇi-pāda hasta (?) ([[BG 13.14 (1972)|BG 13.14]]).
'''Indian (2):''' You become . . . (indistinct)


(Everywhere are His hands and legs, His eyes and faces, and He hears everything. In this way the Supersoul exists.)
'''Prabhupāda:''' That is representative. This is intelligence. We have to know what God wants. And if we act according to that then we are representative. Not that God has to come here and give you a certificate, "Oh this is, this man is my representative." You are already representative, ''sarvataḥ pāṇi-pāda hasta'' ([[BG 13.14 (1972)|BG 13.14]]).


In Bhagavad-gītā he has got everywhere his hands and legs. That means everywhere he has got representative. Everyone of us is representative because we are part and parcel but if I deny then it is māyā. Actually I am representative, if I deny then no. "I don't care for Kṛṣṇa," then I am in māyā.
In ''Bhagavad-gītā'', he has got everywhere his hands and legs. That means everywhere he has got representative. Everyone of us is representative because we are part and parcel but if I deny then it is ''māyā''. Actually I am representative, if I deny then no. "I don't care for Kṛṣṇa," then I am in ''māyā''.


Devotee: (indistinct)  
'''Devotee:''' . . . (indistinct)


Prabhupāda: So this Krishna Consciousness Movement is very scientific movement. Authorized movement.
'''Prabhupāda:''' So this Krishna Consciousness Movement is very scientific movement. Authorized movement.


Indian (2): Does it (indistinct) also?
'''Indian (2):''' Does it . . . (indistinct) . . . also?


Prabhupāda: Don't you see, here in action?
'''Prabhupāda:''' Don't you see, here in action?


Indian (2): No, you say that you follow this and you do this and do not do it.
'''Indian (2):''' No, to say that you follow this and you do this and do not do it.


Prabhupāda: Yes.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes.


Indian (2): This is something to propagate and to convert the God but to...
'''Indian (2):''' This is something to propagate and to convert the God but to . . .


Prabhupāda: But that is your business to canvass for God. That is representative. What is representative? He is canvassing for God. That is all. That is representative. What do you mean by representative? If he does not canvass for God what kind of representative? He is a bogus. You have to work for God that is your principles.
'''Prabhupāda:''' But that is your business to canvass for God. That is representative. What is representative? He is canvassing for God. That is all. That is representative. What do you mean by representative? If he does not canvass for God what kind of representative? He is a bogus. You have to work for God that is your principles.


Devotee: (indistinct)
'''Devotee:''' . . . (indistinct)


Prabhupāda: Eh?
'''Prabhupāda:''' Eh?


Indian (2): From the hell to.
'''Indian (2):''' From the hell to.


Prabhupāda: I am not King of any society. First of all you try to understand, what is mean by representation of. Representative of God. Anyone may become representative of God. It does not mean Indian's have monopolised to become representative of God. Everyone can be.
'''Prabhupāda:''' I am not King of any society. First of all you try to understand, what is mean by representation of . . . representative of God. Anyone may become representative of God. It does not mean Indian's have monopolised to become representative of God. Everyone can be.


Indian (2): (indistinct)
'''Indian (2):''' . . . (indistinct)


Prabhupāda: Yes, everyone.. Kṛṣṇa is the father of everyone, even the animals. Therefore there should be no distinction, that Indians should be representative of Kṛṣṇa and not the Americans. This is not mentioned in any where, Bhagavad-gītā.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes, everyone . . . Kṛṣṇa is the father of everyone, even the animals. Therefore there should be no distinction, that Indians should be representative of Kṛṣṇa and not the Americans. This is not mentioned in any where, ''Bhagavad-gītā''.


:''sarva-yoniṣu kaunteya''
:''sarva-yoniṣu kaunteya''
:''sambhavanti mūrtayaḥ yāḥ''
:''sambhavanti mūrtayaḥ yāḥ''
([[BG 14.4 (1972)|BG 14.4]])
:([[BG 14.4 (1972)|BG 14.4]])


(It should be understood that all species of life, O son of Kuntī, are made possible by birth in this material nature, and that I am the seed-giving father.)
In any species of life. Any form of life. I am the seed giving father. This is ''Bhagavad-gītā''. So we are preaching the philosophy of ''Bhagavad-gītā'', AS IT IS. Therefore we are representative of Kṛṣṇa. Is there any difficulty to understand?


In any species of life. Any form of life. I am the seed giving father. This is Bhagavad-gītā. So we are preaching the philosophy of Bhagavad-gītā, AS IT IS. Therefore we are representative of Kṛṣṇa. Is there any difficulty to understand?
'''Indian (2):''' So is it necessary that one should renounce the world.


Indian (2): So is it necessary that one should renounce the world.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Who says? Why do you put this question?


Prabhupāda: Who says? Why do you put this question?
'''Indian (2):''' Like you have renounced all known.


Indian (2): Like you have renounced all known.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Raghunātha has not renounced, he is a ''gṛhastha''. He has got his wife but the husband and wife they are worshipped.


Prabhupāda: Raghunātha has not renounced, he is a gṛhastha. He has got his wife but the husband and wife they are worshipped.  
'''Indian (2):''' (indistinct) . . . or representative they renounce the world. They leave their family.


Indian (2): (indistinct) or representative they renounce the world. They leave their family.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Renounced the world means renounce to enjoy the world. That is renunciation. I am renounced but I am sitting in a comfortable seat, even you cannot sit at your home. So what does it mean that I am renounced? But I am sitting here for service of Kṛṣṇa that's all. I do not claim that He is mine.


Prabhupāda: Renounced the world means renounce to enjoy the world. That is renunciation. I am renounced but I am sitting in a comfortable seat, even you cannot sit at your home. So what does it mean that I am renounced? But I am sitting here for service of Kṛṣṇa that's all. I do not claim that He is mine.
'''Indian (2):''' Can we not serve the God?


Indian (2): Can we not serve the God?
'''Prabhupāda:''' Why not? Everyone can.


Prabhupāda: Why not? Everyone can.
'''Indian (2):''' But the . . . (indistinct) . . . so many people they say you will have to renounce . . . (indistinct) . . . to become Svāmī.


Indian (2): But the (indistinct) so many people they say you will have to renounce (indistinct) to become Svāmī.
'''Prabhupāda:''' That is. That is a nonsense. He does not know what is God or what is.


Prabhupāda: That is. That is a nonsense. He does not know what is God or what is.
'''Indian (2):''' (indistinct) . . . they have to put their hair . . . they have put on a different sort of dress. They are looking like.


Indian (2): (indistinct) they have put on a different sort of dress. They are looking like.
'''Prabhupāda:''' They may do whatever they may do. You do not do it.


Prabhupāda: They may do whatever they may do. You do not do it.
'''Indian (2):''' No it is necessary.


Indian (2): No it is necessary.
'''Prabhupāda:''' No. It is not necessary. It is not necessary you can do in this dress. If you have got any objection that is cleanliness. You should like to keep your hair. They feel comfortable by giving up this hair. They had also very big, big hair and now they're feeling comfortable. It is a question of facility. That is not very important thing.


Prabhupāda: No. It is not necessary. It is not necessary you can do in this dress. If you have got any objection that is cleanliness. You should like to keep your hair. They feel comfortable by giving up this hair. They had also very big, big hair and now they're feeling comfortable. It is a question of facility. That is not very important thing.
'''Indian (2):''' (indistinct) . . . what is your experience? After hearing what you are doing, what is your experience?


Indian (2): (indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' That you can understand the experience was very bad.


Prabhupāda: That you can understand the experience was very bad.
'''Indian (2):''' (indistinct) . . . otherwise how did you tell me? Why . . . (indistinct)


Indian (2): (indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' That is not very intelligent question.


Prabhupāda: That is not very intelligent question.
'''Indian (2):''' No . . . (indistinct) . . . (break)


Indian (2): No (indistinct) (break)
'''Prabhupāda:''' Established United Nations organisation. Hasti and they are. They are distracting actually there is no. Simply increasing fighting.


Prabhupāda: Established United Nations organisation. Hasti (?) and they are. They are seeing actually there is no. Simply increasing fighting.
'''Indian (2):''' . . . (indistinct)


Indian (2): (indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' And therefore when there were. Whenever there is fighting the young men are called. So therefore they are disappointed. What is this? They speak of thieves, nonsense and they are always calling us for fighting. Is it not the cause of disappointment? There is no practical proposition by all these rascals scientists and politicians. They are simply bluffing. Therefore young men have become disappointed. So this bluffing business should be stopped. Genuine things should be taken. That is ''Bhagavad-gītā''.


Prabhupāda: And therefore when there were. Whenever there is fighting the young men are called. So therefore they are disappointed. What is this? They speak of thieves, nonsense and they are always calling us for fighting. Is it not the cause of disappointment? There is no practical proposition by all these rascals scientists and politicians. They are simply bluffing. Therefore young men have become disappointed. So this bluffing business should be stopped. Genuine things should be taken. That is Bhagavad-gītā.
'''Indian (2):''' But Swamiji . . . (indistinct)


Indian (2): But Swamiji (indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' Eh?


Prabhupāda: Eh?
'''Indian (2):''' Only . . . (indistinct)


Indian (2): Only (indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' No, why you interpret science? They are doing practically.


Prabhupāda: No, why you respect science? They are doing practically.
'''Indian (2):''' Here?


Indian (2): Here?
'''Prabhupāda:''' That's all.


Prabhupāda: That's all.
'''Indian (2):''' . . . (indistinct)


Indian (2): (indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' Eh?


Prabhupāda: Eh?
'''Indian (2):''' . . . (indistinct)


Indian (2): (indistinct)
'''Haṁsadūta:''' We are not sitting idle. Just chanting . . . (indistinct)


Hansadutta: We are not sitting idle. Just chanting. (indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:'''(break) So we are not concerned with the requirement. We are concerned with the teachings, teachings of the ''Bhagavad-gītā.''


Prabhupāda:(break) So we are not concerned with the requirement. We are concerned with the teachings, teachings of Bhagavad-gītā.
'''Indian (2):''' (indistinct) . . . ''Bhagavad-gītā''.


Indian (2): (indistinct) Bhagavad-gītā.
'''Indian (1):''' . . . (indistinct)


Indian (1): (indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' My question is, that you are discussing ''Bhagavad-gītā'', about 25 years and what is your practical result? That is my question.


Prabhupāda: My question is, that you are discussing Bhagavad-gītā, about 25 years and what is your practical result? That is my question.
'''Indian (1):''' (indistinct) . . . ''Bhagavad-gītā''.


Indian (1): (indistinct) Bhagavad-gītā.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Eh?


Prabhupāda: Eh?
'''Indian (1):''' (indistinct) . . . ''Bhagavad-gītā''.


Indian (1): (indistinct) Bhagavad-gītā.
'''Prabhupāda:''' What is that?


Prabhupāda: What is that?
'''Indian (1):''' . . . (indistinct)


Indian (1): (indistinct)
'''Audience:''' (laughter)


Audience: (Laughter)
'''Prabhupāda:''' Just see the position. Now you understand?


Prabhupāda: Just see the position. Now you understand?
'''Indian (2):''' Yes.


Indian (2): Yes.
'''Prabhupāda:''' The same thing which I explained. That ''Bhagavad-gītā'' means minus Kṛṣṇa. One, zero, zero, zero, zero, that's a balance and without that one simply zeros. Imagine however any number of zeros their value is zero. Similarly ''Bhagavad-gītā'' without Kṛṣṇa consciousness it is all zero. That means for the last 35 years you are dealing with zeros. I must tell you frankly. You do not know what is Kṛṣṇa . . . and ''Bhagavad-gītā'' means Kṛṣṇa. So you have carefully avoided Kṛṣṇa.


Prabhupāda: The same thing which I explained. That Bhagavad-gītā means minus Kṛṣṇa. One, zero, zero, zero, zero, that's a balance and without that one simply zeros. Imagine however any number of zeros their value is zero. Similarly Bhagavad-gītā without Kṛṣṇa consciousness it is all zero. That means for the last 35 years you are dealing with zeros. I must tell you frankly. You do not know what is Kṛṣṇa... And Bhagavad-gītā means Kṛṣṇa. So you have carefully avoided Kṛṣṇa.
'''Devotee:''' . . . (indistinct)


Devotee: (indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' (laughter) Eh? That is the going on everywhere. There are so many Gītā Bhavan's all over the country. Where there is no understanding of Kṛṣṇa. And ''Bhagavad-gītā'' Kṛṣṇa is canvassing, I am this, I am this, I am this, I am this, I am this. So just try to understand what kind of ''Bhagavad-gītā'' you are reading. There are so many scholars of ''Bhagavad-gītā'' all over the world in institutions for preaching ''Bhagavad-gītā''. But everywhere I go—minus Kṛṣṇa. Finished business.


Prabhupāda: (Laughter) Eh? That is the going on everywhere. There are so many Gītā Bhavan's all over the country. Where there is no understanding of Kṛṣṇa. And Bhagavad-gītā Kṛṣṇa is canvassing, I am this, I am this, I am this, I am this, I am this. So just try to understand what kind of Bhagavad-gītā you are reading. There are so many scholars of Bhagavad-gītā all over the world in institutions for preaching Bhagavad-gītā. But everywhere I go—minus Kṛṣṇa. Finished business.  
So this is the first time in the history of the world at least that we are preaching Kṛṣṇa is everything in the ''Bhagavad-gītā'' . . . here also the same thing there is one idol speaker and so many dolls of different demigods and none of the members practically know thoroughly what is Kṛṣṇa. Neither the Kṛṣṇa's instruction is followed: ''mām ekaṁśaraṇaṁ vraja'' ([[BG 18.66 (1972)|BG 18.66]]).


So this is the first time in the history of the world at least that we are preaching Kṛṣṇa is everything in the Bhagavad-gītā... Here also the same thing there is one idol speaker and so many dolls of different demigods and none of the members practically know thoroughly what is Kṛṣṇa. Neither the Kṛṣṇa's instruction is followed: mām ekaṁśaraṇaṁ vraja ([[BG 18.66 (1972)|BG 18.66]]).
If one was to follow ''mām ekaṁ kṛṣṇa'', then why so many dolls and pictures?


(Abandon all varieties of religion and just surrender unto Me. I shall deliver you from all sinful reaction. Do not fear.)
(pause)


If one was to follow mām ekaṁ kṛṣṇa, then why so many dolls and pictures?
And we have started this Krishna Consciousness Movement—all the members they do not know anything but Kṛṣṇa. You see practically. Just see the difference of preaching of this Krishna Consciousness Movement and others dealing with ''Bhagavad-gītā''. Now try to understand.


(Pause)
'''Indian (2):''' . . . (indistinct)


And we have started this Krishna Consciousness Movement—all the members they do not know anything but Kṛṣṇa. You can see practically. Just see the difference of preaching of this Krishna Consciousness Movement and others dealing with Bhagavad-gītā. Now try to understand.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Eh?


Indian (2): (indistinct)
'''Indian (2):''' Swamiji . . . (indistinct)


Prabhupāda: Eh?
'''Prabhupāda:''' They are not doing anything. Neither understand. Do they understand what is Kṛṣṇa? They simply take advantage of the popular book of ''Bhagavad-gītā'', that's all. Gandhi dealt in politics. Of course even in ''Bhagavad-gītā'' there is politics also. But he wanted to introduce nonviolence. He was understood to be a great devotee of ''Bhagavad-gītā''. But where is ''Bhagavad-gītā'' in nonviolence?


Indian (2): Swamiji (indistinct)
'''Indian (2):''' . . . (indistinct)


Prabhupāda: They are not doing anything. Neither understand. Do they understand what is Kṛṣṇa? They simply take advantage of the popular book of Bhagavad-gītā, that's all. Gandhi dealt in politics. Of course even in Bhagavad-gītā there is politics also. But he wanted to introduce nonviolence. He was understood to be a great devotee of Bhagavad-gītā. But where is Bhagavad-gītā in nonviolence?
'''Prabhupāda:''' Kṛṣṇa you'll see so many pictures in our book. Kṛṣṇa is engaged in violence. So many demons are being killed. Personally He's killing. And He says: ''paritrāṇāya sādhūnāṁn vināśāya ca duṣkṛtāḥ'' ([[BG 4.8 (1972)|BG 4.8]]).


Indian (2): (indistinct)
"To kill the ''duṣkṛtaḥ''," and He is practically doing that. So where is the question of Kṛṣṇa's life, nonviolence? When He was child He committed violence, immediately.


Prabhupāda: Kṛṣṇa you'll see so many pictures in our book. Kṛṣṇa is engaged in violence. So many demons are being killed. Personally He's killing. And He says: paritrāṇāya sādhūnāṁn vināśāya ca duṣkṛtāḥ ([[BG 4.8 (1972)|BG 4.8]]).
'''Devotee:''' . . . (indistinct)


(In order to deliver the pious and to annihilate the miscreants, as well as to reestablish the principles of religion, I advent Myself millennium after millennium.)
'''Indian (2):''' . . . (indistinct)


"To kill the duṣkṛtaḥ," and He is practically doing that. So where is the question of Kṛṣṇa's life, nonviolence? When He was child He committed violence, immediately.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Not different cinemas.


Devotee: (indistinct)
'''Indian (2):''' . . . (indistinct)


Indian (2): (indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' Sohi-vit. And in. And His enemies also found in the very beginning of His coming out from the womb of His mother. Kaṁsa was ready to kill Him. So He has got enemies from the very beginning of His life and He has begun killing from the beginning of His life. All the enemies He perturbed. So how you can prove that Kṛṣṇa was non-violent? But Gandhi took that, "I shall prove nonviolence from ''Bhagavad-gītā''." That means he misled, ''Bhagavad-gītā''.


Prabhupāda: Not different cinemas.
If you want to do something which is not, then you should misinform people. This is this, this is that. If you receive a wood and if you want to prove that it is gold. Then you have to make some propaganda, false propaganda. That's all. Because actually it is wood. So how can you prove that it is gold? That means you have to make some false propaganda and make wood so they will accept it as gold. Similarly Kṛṣṇa is full of violence and if from the life of Kṛṣṇa you want to prove nonviolence. That means you have to make false propaganda. That is being done.


Indian (2): (indistinct)
So if you are actually . . . my request to you is that for the last 45 years I may tell you frankly that they are simply wasted. If you want actually to derive some benefit from ''Bhagavad-gītā'', then this now here. Don't be misguided. That is my request. Why you should be misguided? When you have got this genuine knowledge of God as ''Bhagavad-gītā''. Why you should be misguided? Why you should be allowed to be misguided? That is my request. People are searching after God, you're doubtful about God, in the presence of ''Bhagavad-gītā''. How much foolishness it is.


Prabhupāda: Sohi-vit(?). And in. And His enemies also found in the very beginning of His coming out from the womb of His mother. Kaṁsa was ready to kill Him. So He has got enemies from the very beginning of His life and He has begun killing from the beginning of His life. All the enemies He perturbed. So how you can prove that Kṛṣṇa was non-violent? But Gandhi took that, "I shall prove nonviolence from Bhagavad-gītā." That means he misled, Bhagavad-gītā.  
If the thing's present and if you say: "I don't find it." Then how much foolishness it is? If the light is there and if you say: "I am in darkness. I do not find the light." Then you become . . . what is called? Owl. Owl, although there is day and there is sun, he does not know. That there is sun and there is light. It is owl's philosophy. Frog philosophy, owl's philosophy. Eh? Owl in the presence of shine, sun, he close eyes and he says: "No, there is no sun. There is no light." In the name of ''Bhagavad-gītā'' this owl philosophy is going on. And sometimes frog philosophy is going on.


If you want to do something which is not, then you should misinform people. This is this, this is that. If you receive a wood and if you want to prove that it is gold. Then you have to make some propaganda, false propaganda. That's all. Because actually it is wood. So how can you prove that it is gold? That means you have to make some false propaganda and make wood so they will accept it as gold. Similarly Kṛṣṇa is full of violence and if from the life of Kṛṣṇa you want to prove nonviolence. That means you have to make false propaganda. That is being done.  
'''Indian (2):''' (laughs) naturally.


So if you are actually… My request to you is that for the last 45 years I may tell you frankly that they are simply wasted. If you want actually to derive some benefit from Bhagavad-gītā, then this now here. Don't be misguided. That is my request. Why you should be misguided? When you have got this genuine knowledge of God as Bhagavad-gītā. Why you should be misguided? Why you should be allowed to be misguided? That is my request. People are searching after God, you're doubtful about God, in the presence of Bhagavad-gītā. How much foolishness it is.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes. The frog philosophy, you know?


If the thing's present and if you say, "I don't find it." Then how much foolishness it is? If the light is there and if you say, "I am in darkness. I do not find the light." Then you become.. What is called? Owl. Owl, although there is day and there is sun, he does not know. That there is sun and there is light. It is owl's philosophy. Frog philosophy, owl's philosophy. Eh? Owl in the presence of shine, sun, he close eyes and he says, "No, there is no sun. There is no light." In the name of Bhagavad-gītā this owl philosophy is going on. And sometimes frog philosophy is going on.
'''Indian (2):''' Yes.


Indian (2): (Laughter) naturally.
'''Prabhupāda:''' What is that?


Prabhupāda: Yes. The frog philosophy, you know?
'''Indian (2):''' The well is the whole world.


Indian (2): Yes.
'''Prabhupāda:''' No frog philosophy. Do you know frog?


Prabhupāda: What is that?
'''Indian (2):''' That I know.


Indian (2): The well is the whole world.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Eh? That if you. It has got a philosophy. That is called frog philosophy. What is that?


Prabhupāda: No frog philosophy. Do you know frog?
'''Indian (2):''' It doesn't consider anything else than the well.


Indian (2): That I know.
'''Prabhupāda:''' That is the well. Yes. He is trying to understand Atlantic ocean from within the well. So what he will understand? He's simply measuring, "Ah, Atlantic ocean may be so big, so big, so big and then he becomes . . . what is called? . . . (indistinct) . . . puzzled. You see? And similarly people are thinking, "I am God, I am God, I am God." Now this philosophy is going on. Somebody is saying, "God is dead. There is no God, or gone." And somebody is saying: "I am God, you are God, everyone God." So practically the same thing. This is frog philosophy. And in the presence of God if one says: "That there is no God." That is called owl's philosophy.


Prabhupāda: Eh? That if you. It has got a philosophy. That is called frog philosophy. What is that?
So we should not be misled by this owl's philosophy and frog's philosophy. We should follow the real philosophy and then it will be benefited. Why these people say: "There is no God?" In the presence of Kṛṣṇa. What is their reason? Can you say? Why people say: "That there is no God?" Can you say? Can anyone of you say? What do you think?


Indian (2): It doesn't consider anything else than the well.
'''Mātājī:'''  I . . . (indistinct)


Prabhupāda: That is the well. Yes. He is trying to understand Atlantic ocean within the well. So what he will understand? He's simply measuring, "Ah, Atlantic ocean may be so big, so big, so big and then he becomes... What is called? Puzzled. You see? And similarly people are thinking, "I am God, I am God, I am God." Now this philosophy is going on. Somebody is saying, "God is dead. There is no God, or gone." And somebody is saying, "I am God, you are God, everyone God." So practically the same thing. This is frog philosophy. And in the presence of God if one says, "That there is no God." That is called owl's philosophy.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Eh?


So we should not be misled by this owl's philosophy and frog's philosophy. We should follow the real philosophy and then it will be benefited. Why these people say, "There is no God?" In the presence of Kṛṣṇa. What is their reason? Can you say? Why people say, "That there is no God?" Can you say? Can anyone of you say? What do you think?
'''Mātājī:''' I personally think . . . (indistinct) . . . name Kṛṣṇa or Rāma . . . (indistinct) . . . they are the Supreme Power . . . (indistinct) . . . Kṛṣṇa.


Mātājī: I (indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' You know that Supreme Power?


Prabhupāda: Eh?
'''Mātājī:''' Yes.


Mātājī: I personally think (indistinct) name Kṛṣṇa or Rāma (indistinct) they are the Supreme Power (indistinct) Kṛṣṇa.
'''Prabhupāda:''' It is not Kṛṣṇa?


Prabhupāda: You know that Supreme Power?
'''Mātājī:''' (indistinct) . . . Kṛṣṇa . . . (indistinct) . . . Kṛṣṇa. But then . . . (indistinct)


Mātājī: Yes.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Do you accept Kṛṣṇa as God?


Prabhupāda: It is not Kṛṣṇa?
'''Mātājī:''' (indistinct) . . . God . . . (indistinct) . . . the Supreme Power is Kṛṣṇa. Whatever name . . . (indistinct) . . . but there is a power.


Mātājī:(indistinct) Kṛṣṇa (indistinct) Kṛṣṇa. But then (indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' I mean to say, that have you got any objection to accept Kṛṣṇa as the Supreme Power?


Prabhupāda: Do you accept Kṛṣṇa as God?
'''Mātājī:''' No, no objection.


Mātājī: (indistinct) God (indistinct) the Supreme Power is Kṛṣṇa. Whatever name (indistinct) but there is a power.
'''Prabhupāda:''' That is my point.


Prabhupāda: I mean to say, that have you got any objection to accept Kṛṣṇa as the Supreme Power?
'''Mātājī:''' I accept . . . (indistinct)


Mātājī: No, no objection.
'''Prabhupāda:''' (laughs) there is somebody. That's nice proposition. But if that somebody is Kṛṣṇa whether you have got any objection? Not that I am certain somebody.


Prabhupāda: That is my point.
'''Mātājī:''' . . . (indistinct)


Mātājī: I accept (indistinct).
'''Prabhupāda:''' To say, "Somebody must be my father?" Because I am born. Why I do not know who is my father? Is that very good intelligence? Your proposition.


Prabhupāda: (Laughs) there is somebody. That's nice proposition. But if that somebody is Kṛṣṇa whether you have got any objection? Not that I am certain somebody.
'''Mātājī:''' (indistinct) . . . father.


Mātājī:(indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' That is a fact, that is a fact.


Prabhupāda: To say, "Somebody must be my father?" Because I am born. Why I do not know who is my father? Is that very good intelligence? Your proposition.
'''Mātājī:''' (indistinct) . . . I have father.


Mātājī: (indistinct) father.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes.


Prabhupāda: That is a fact, that is a fact.
'''Mātājī:''' And my father made me . . . (indistinct)


Mātājī: (indistinct) I have father.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes. So if you do not know that. Then your knowledge is imperfect. If you simply think, "Yes because I am born. There is. Must be there is father." That's nice. But I do not know the name of father. That's very good intelligence?


Prabhupāda: Yes.
'''Mātājī:''' No, no.


Mātājī: And my father made me (indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' Then?


Prabhupāda: Yes. So you do not know that. Then your knowledge is imperfect. If you simply think, "Yes because I am born. There is. Must be there is father." That's nice. But I do not know the name of father. That's very good intelligence?
'''Mātājī:''' I have . . . (indistinct)


Mātājī: No, no.
'''Prabhupāda:''' No first of all you answer this.


Prabhupāda: Then?
'''Mātājī:''' . . . (indistinct)


Mātājī: I have (indistinct).
'''Prabhupāda:''' Do you accept that there is a father? Suppose you are born a posthumous child, you have never seen your father. Since the birth. But when you are grown-up you know there must be some father otherwise how I am born? But if you say I do not know the name of my father. Is that very good intelligence?


Prabhupāda: No first of all you answer this.
'''Mātājī:''' No it is not . . . (indistinct)


Mātājī:(indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' Then? So how you can say that there is some God but I do not know what is his name.


Prabhupāda: Do you accept that there is a father? Suppose you are born a posthumous child, you have never seen your father. Since the birth. But when you are grown-up you know there must be some father otherwise how I am born? But if you say I do not know the name of my father. Is that very good intelligence?
'''Mātājī:''' No I know his name . . . (indistinct)


Mātājī: No it is not. (indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' Eh?


Prabhupāda: Then? So how you can say that there is some God but I do not know what is his name.
'''Indian (2):''' (indistinct) . . . how can you say that . . . (indistinct)


Mātājī: No I know his name. (indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' No, if you know from your mother. You might have not seen your father but your mother knows exactly what is your father. Therefore you have to learn from your mother what is the name of your father. You may be posthumous child while you are in the womb of your mother your father might have died. I am giving an example. So after your birth you might have not seen your father but that does not mean you should not know about your father. Does it mean that because you have not seen your father you could not know anything and everything of your father? Is that a good philosophy?


Prabhupāda: Eh?
'''Mātājī:''' No.


Indian (2): (indistinct) how can you say that (indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' Similarly you might have not seen God but you must know everything of God. That is intelligence. Then how you can know it? That is the point. Just like you have to know from a reliable authority your mother. Who knows actually what is . . . who is your father. You cannot know about your father from any other man. Except your mother. If your mother says that your father was like this, your father's teacher. This is the coat of your father. And he was such and such nice gentleman his name was this, he was doing like that.


Prabhupāda: No, you know from your mother. You might have not seen your father but your mother knows exactly what is your father. Therefore you have to learn from your mother what is the name of your father. You may be posthumous child while you are in the womb of your mother your father might have died. I am giving an example. So after your birth you might have not seen your father but that does not mean you should not know about your father. Does it mean that because you not seeing your father you could not know anything and everything of your father? Is that a good philosophy?
Then you know everything even though you have not seen your father. So similarly, it is not necessary that you have to see Kṛṣṇa or God personally. But there is a source to know about Him. That is the ''Vedas''. You cannot evade to understand about your father simply because you have not seen. That is not argument. You cannot say that because you have not seen God therefore I do not believe in God or I do not know anything about God. That is not intelligence.


Mātājī: No.
'''Mātājī:''' . . . (indistinct)


Prabhupāda: Similarly you might have not seen God but you must know everything of God. That is intelligence. Then how you can know it? That is the point. Just like you have to know from a reliable authority your mother. Who knows actually what is… Who is your father. You cannot know about your father from any other man. Except your mother. If your mother says that your father was like this, your father's teacher (?) This is the coat of your father. And he was such and such nice gentleman his name was this, he was doing like that.  
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes.


Then you know everything even though you have not seen your father. So similarly, it is not necessary that you have to see Kṛṣṇa or God personally. But there is a source to know about Him. That is the Vedas. You cannot evade to understand about your father simply because you have not seen. That is not argument. You cannot say that because you have not seen God therefore I do not believe in God or I do not know anything about God. That is not intelligence.
'''Mātājī:''' (indistinct) . . . there is mother to answer the question right. But here there are so many, I mean to say . . .


Mātājī:(indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' What? No. There cannot be so many.


Prabhupāda: Yes.
'''Mātājī:''' . . . (indistinct)


Mātājī: (indistinct) there is mother to answer the question right. But here there are so many, I mean to say…
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes.


Prabhupāda: What? No. There cannot be so many.
'''Mātājī:''' . . . (indistinct)


Mātājī:(indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' I have discovered it.


Prabhupāda: Yes.
'''Mātājī:''' . . . (indistinct)


Mātājī:(indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' Mother means—right mother.


Prabhupāda: I have discovered it. (?)
'''Mātājī:''' . . . (indistinct)


Mātājī:(indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' Mother does not mean false mother.


Prabhupāda: Mother means—right mother.
'''Mātājī:''' No, no I don't mean that.


Mātājī:(indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes.


Prabhupāda: Mother does not mean false mother.
'''Mātājī:''' But how do we know . . . (indistinct) . . . but we are . . . (indistinct) . . . don't know. Who should answer the question if he is disentitled.


Mātājī: No, no I don't mean that.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes. Your answer to your question is very intelligent. Therefore we call ''vedamātā''. ''Vedamātā'' have you heard this word?


Prabhupāda: Yes.
'''Mātājī:''' No.


Mātājī: But how do we know (indistinct) but we are (indistinct) don't know. Who should answer the question if he is disentitled.
'''Prabhupāda:''' ''Veda''. The knowledge of ''Vedas'' is considered as mother.


Prabhupāda: Yes. Your answer to your question is very intelligent. Therefore we call vedamātā. Vedamātā have you have this word?
'''Mātājī:''' Yes that I know.


Mātājī: No.
'''Prabhupāda:''' So you have to learn from the ''Vedas''. ''Vedamātā''. Just like you learn about your father from your real mother. Similarly the original father Kṛṣṇa, you have to learn from the ''Vedas''. Because Kṛṣṇa says, ''vedaiś ca sarvair aham eva vedyam'' ([[BG 15.15 (1972)|BG 15.15]]).


Prabhupāda: Veda. The knowledge of Vedas is considered as mother.
(I am seated in everyone's heart, and from Me come remembrance, knowledge and forgetfulness. By all the ''Vedas'' am I to be known; indeed I am the compiler of ''Vedānta'', and I am the knower of the ''Vedas''.)


Mātājī: Yes that I know.
The ''Vedas'' gives . . . knowledge about Me. Through Veda one has to learn Kṛṣṇa. Therefore we take ''Vedas'' and the followers of ''Vedānta'' and the commentary on ''Vedānta''. Then you know what is God. ''Vedānta'' says that the father God is the supreme father who has begotten everything, ''janmādy asya yataḥ'' (Vedānta Sūtra 1.1.2).


Prabhupāda: So you have to learn from the Vedas. Vedamātā. Just like you learn about your father from your real mother. Similarly the original father Kṛṣṇa, you have to learn from the Vedas. Because Kṛṣṇa says, vedaiś ca sarvair aham eva vedyam ([[BG 15.15 (1972)|BG 15.15]]).  
From whom everything has taken birth. Just like father gives birth to the child. Or the state or the anything in the family. Similarly the Parabrahma, Supreme Brahma is He who has begotten everything. All these living entities, this material world—and that is explained in the ''Bhagavad-gītā''. That these five elements; ''bhūmir āpo 'nalo vāyuḥ khaṁbuddhir mano eva . . . iti bhinnā prakṛtir aṣṭadhā'' ([[BG 7.4 (1972)|BG 7.4]]).


(I am seated in everyone's heart, and from Me come remembrance, knowledge and forgetfulness. By all the Vedas am I to be known; indeed I am the compiler of Vedānta, and I am the knower of the Vedas.)
''Me'', that is Kṛṣṇa's. And again he says: ''apareyam itas tv viddhi me prakṛtiṁ parām jīva-bhūtāṁ mahā-bāho yayedaṁ dhāryate jagat'' ([[BG 7.5 (1972)|BG 7.5]]).


The Vedas gives. Knowledge about Me. Through Veda one has to learn Kṛṣṇa. Therefore we take Vedas and the followers of Vedānta and the commentary on Vedānta. Then you know what is God. Vedānta says that the father God is the supreme father who has begotten everything, janmādy asya yataḥ (Vedānta Sūtra 1.1.2).
There is another ''prakṛti'', that is ''jīva''. So what is this material world? These five elements, mind intelligence and the ''jīva''. That's all. And these things are ''prakṛti'' of Kṛṣṇa, wife or ''strī'' of Kṛṣṇa. And Kṛṣṇa is the father. And ''prakṛti'' is the mother and everything is born out of Kṛṣṇa and this ''prakṛti''.
 
From whom everything has taken birth. Just like father gives birth to the child. Or the state or the anything in the family. Similarly the Parabrahma, Supreme Brahma is He who has begotten everything. All these living entities, this material world—and that is explained in the Bhagavad-gītā. That these five elements; bhūmir āpo 'nalo vāyuḥ khaṁbuddhir mano eva..., iti bhinnā prakṛtir aṣṭadhā ([[BG 7.4 (1972)|Bg 7.4]]).
 
(Earth, water, fire, air, ether, mind, intelligence and false ego—altogether these eight comprise My separated material energies.)
 
Me, that is Kṛṣṇa's. And again he says: apareyam itas tv viddhi me prakṛtiṁ parām jīva-bhūtāṁ mahā-bāho yayedaṁ dhāryate jagat ([[BG 7.5 (1972)|Bg 7.5]]).
 
(Besides this inferior nature, O mighty-armed Arjuna, there is a superior energy of Mine, which are all living entities who are struggling with material nature and are sustaining the universe.)
 
There is another prakṛti, that is jīva. So what is this material world? These five elements, mind intelligence and the jīva. That's all. And these things are prakṛti of Kṛṣṇa, wife or strī of Kṛṣṇa. And Kṛṣṇa is the father. And prakṛti is the mother and everything is born out of Kṛṣṇa and this prakṛti.


:''sarva-yoniṣu kaunteya''
:''sarva-yoniṣu kaunteya''
Line 538: Line 528:
:''tāsāṁ mahad yonir brahma''
:''tāsāṁ mahad yonir brahma''
:''ahaṁ bīja-pradaḥ pitā''
:''ahaṁ bīja-pradaḥ pitā''
([[BG 14.4 (1972)|Bg 14.4]])
:([[BG 14.4 (1972)|BG 14.4]])
 
(It should be understood that all species of life, O son of Kuntī, are made possible by birth in this material nature, and that I am the seed-giving father.)
 
I am the seed giving father. So how you cannot (break)... simply fighting, "Oh, I am Hindu and you are Moslem. Your religion is bad, my religion is better." You see? What you have learned from your religion? What is the principal of religion? There is none. Dharmaṁ tu sākṣād bhagavat-praṇītam (SB 6.3.19) that Bhāgavata says.
 
(Real religious principles are enacted by the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Although fully situated in the mode of goodness, even the great ṛṣis who occupy the topmost planets cannot ascertain the real religious principles, nor can the demigods or the leaders of Siddhaloka, to say nothing of the asuras, ordinary human beings, Vidyādharas and Cāraṇas.)


Simply, religion means the course of God. That is religion. There is no God, God is dead, God is impersonal. What does it mean by the course? That you make your own course? And that is accepted as religion. They bring forward some artificial avatāras and everyone is bluffed. In this way the whole religious principles are being spoiled in the world. So we have to fight against that. That is Kṛṣṇa consciousness. So don't give any credit to any person because he has deviated from the religious principles. Religious principles means to obey the orders of God—that is religion. They do not know what is God or what is avatāra of God. Even there is no other they do not. They do not obey. They disobey. And still they claim that I am guru. Nobody is perfect.
I am the seed giving father. So how you cannot (break) . . . simply fighting, "Oh, I am Hindu and you are Moslem. Your religion is bad, my religion is better." You see? What you have learned from your religion? What is the principal of religion? There is none. ''Dharmaṁ tu sākṣād bhagavat-praṇītam'' (SB 6.3.19) that ''Bhāgavata'' says.


So our mission is very grave and it should be act sincerly and then we get power from Kṛṣṇa. If we act sincerly as representative of Kṛṣṇa then we will feel His power. So generally we utilize religion as a means of livelihood. That is going on. Eh? That is going on... Anywhere all over the world, still the natural tendency, kṛṣṇa-bhakti nitya-siddha, kṛṣṇa-bhakti (Madhya 22.107).  
Simply, religion means the course of God. That is religion. There is no God, God is dead, God is impersonal. What does it mean by the course? That you make your own course? And that is accepted as religion. They bring forward some artificial ''avatāras'' and everyone is bluffed. In this way the whole religious principles are being spoiled in the world. So we have to fight against that. That is Kṛṣṇa consciousness. So don't give any credit to any person because he has deviated from the religious principles. Religious principles means to obey the orders of God—that is religion. They do not know what is God or what is the order of God. Even there is no other they do not. They do not obey. They disobey. And still they claim that I am ''guru''. Nobody is perfect.


(”Pure love for Kṛṣṇa is eternally established in the hearts of the living entities. It is not something to be gained from another source. When the heart is purified by hearing and chanting, this love naturally awakens.)
So our mission is very grave and it should be act sincerly and then we get power from Kṛṣṇa. If we act really as representative of Kṛṣṇa then we will feel His power. So generally we utilize religion as a means of livelihood. That is going on. Eh? That is going on . . . anywhere all over the world, still because the natural tendency, ''kṛṣṇa-bhakti nitya-siddha'', ''kṛṣṇa-bhakti'' ([[CC Madhya 22.107]]).


Affection for Kṛṣṇa or God there is everywhere. And, therefore whenever there is some religious talk people gather, people like it. But these leaders, religious leaders they fight, for their livelihood. Therefore it is degraded.
Affection for Kṛṣṇa or God there is everywhere. And, therefore whenever there is some religious talk people gather, people like it. But these leaders, religious leaders they fight, for their livelihood. Therefore it is degraded.


Hansadutta: (indistinct)
'''Haṁsadūta:''' . . . (indistinct)


:''Prabhupāda: Eh?''
'''Prabhupāda:''' Eh?


Hansadutta: (indistinct)
'''Haṁsadūta:''' . . . (indistinct)


Prabhupāda: That they… They do not know. They are not bad men. I can can understand that old man. He is not a bad man and this, what is called? Bhogaji, bhogaji, he also is not a bad man. But he's not…They are not properly guided. They have learned some hodgepodge. That's all. That is going on everywhere. Just like yesterday the two boys came.
'''Prabhupāda:''' That they . . . they do not know. They are not bad men. I can understand that old man. He is not a bad man and this, what is called? ''Bhogaji'', ''vairagi'', he also not a bad man. But he's not . . . they are not properly guided. They have learned some hodgepodge. That's all. That is going on everywhere. Just like yesterday two boys came.


Hansadutta: Yes.
'''Haṁsadūta:''' Yes.


Prabhupāda: And (indistinct) everything. For the last 45 years. (Laughter) they are conducting (indistinct) and I tell him. (indistinct), that you do not know anything. And they admit it. How they can know? Unless they hear from the representative of Kṛṣṇa they cannot understand. It is not possible. That is going on all over the world... And the people say that's nice. Then you are the (indistinct). Challenging like that, "Then are you the only representative of Kṛṣṇa present?" So I said, "Yes." Because. Because I know because I am sincere representative, representing my Guru Mahārāja. Therefore I am clear representative of Kṛṣṇa. That's all... That telling they cannot do...  
'''Prabhupāda:''' And . . . (indistinct) . . . everything. For the last 45 years. (laughter) they are conducting . . . (indistinct) . . . and I tell him . . . (indistinct) . . . that you do not know anything. And they admit it. How they can know? Unless they hear from the representative of Kṛṣṇa they cannot understand. It is not possible. That is going on all over the world . . . and the people say that's nice. Then you are the . . . (indistinct) . . . challenging like that, "Then are you the only representative of Kṛṣṇa's present?" So I said, "Yes." Yes. Because I know because I am sincere representative, representing my Guru Mahārāja. Therefore I am clear representative of Kṛṣṇa. That's all . . . that telling they cannot do . . .


(Pause)... Now begin. (End)
(pause) Now begin. (end)

Latest revision as of 04:34, 7 February 2024

His Divine Grace
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada



701205R2-Indore - December 05, 1970 - 44:46 Minutes



Devotee: Śrīla Prabhupāda invited at Baba Bal Mukund and Vairāgya-bhava Mahārāja, had come to Indore from Bombay. On 3rd of December and he delivered lectures. The last two lectures recorded in the morning of the fourth and fifth. At the Gītā Bhavan in Indore and the last speaking was kīrtana then in the room of Baba Bal Mukund. At the Gītā Bhavan and just after the lecture on the fifth. Present now with His Divine Grace in Indore just now, Himāvatī and Hansadutta and Revatīnandana das brahmacārī.

Prabhupāda: (indistinct) . . . I am willing give me this nice foodstuff into my mouth. That means the part and parcel is healthy when he gives service to the whole body. Similarly, because you are part and parcel of . . .

(break) . . . that is your . . . (indistinct) . . . you'll have. You can adopt any other process. Suppose the finger catches one sweetmeat, if you think, if the finger thinks that we are puzzled why shall I give it to the stomach? Let me enjoy. It will not be able to enjoy. It will simply spoil.

Similarly we part and parcel . . . the karmīs, they are trying to enjoy themselves in this world. So their mistake. They cannot enjoy, therefore they are unhappy here. The jñānīs they are rejecting this world, brahma satyaṁ jagan mithyā. So it is the hands business to take a sweetmeat and if it is robbed for personal enjoyment, it is waste of time. It will gives us, so I cannot enjoy therefore I stick to this, thrown away. That is not limited. But if the finger takes it and gives it to the stomach that is its real duty.

Similarly if you want to enjoy this world that is mistake. If you want to renounce this world, that is mistake. If you take this world for service of the Lord—that is enjoyment.

So what is your question about this? Mātājī boliye. (Yes, mataji you can ask.) Did you follow what I said?

Mātājī: . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Eh?

Mātājī: . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Ah. So.

Indian (1): My question actually is about this thing.

Prabhupāda: Yes.

Indian (1): Therefore as we grow old, service towards God.

Prabhupāda: Yes.

Indian (1): . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Lul.

Indian (1): Lul.

Prabhupāda: Yes.

Indian (1): And in that way he becomes too much selfish, in full.

Prabhupāda: No, no that is not selfish.

Indian (1): . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: No, you do not . . . you did not understand. If we say there is a story parāṇy indriyāna in Hitopadeśa. That the senses of the body they made a strike. That the stomach is eating simply and we are working. The leg said, "Oh I am walking," the hands said that, "I am doing this." The finger said, "I am." All the senses, just like now a days there is strike. So there was a strike they failed to fill the stomach. But the result was gradually they became weak.

The next conference on the matter, "Why you are becoming weak." Then they found that the only reason is that we did not serve the stomach. So let us again begin to serve the stomach. They become happy. Similarly the whole modern civilisation has revolted against God, so that becoming . . . (indistinct) . . . if there is a relut again to serve God, they will be happy. Otherwise there is no happiness. There is no peace.

Indian (1): Swami I have been told to that . . . (indistinct) . . . nagar. I met, some other representatives of . . . (indistinct) . . . they told me then I asked him what makes you to come over here. Some thousand miles from their country. They told me that is a lot of disappointment in our country. I said . . . (indistinct) . . . these people. Are they actually covering what we want to teach, do our philosophy or they have simply have come . . . just in their own . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: But do you know your philosophy? You want to know but do you know what is your philosophy?

Indian (1): We have lost the spiritual. The spiritually . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Who?

Indian (1): (indistinct) . . . what Gītā is.

Prabhupāda: Yes. Do you understand the Gītā?

Indian (1): No I don't.

Prabhupāda: Then?

Indian (1): Nobody can claim to understand it. We came to just try to understand it.

Prabhupāda: Then how you will be taught? Talking on the Bhagavad-gītā if you do not understand it?

Indian (1): . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Ah. So this is the point. That you cannot be aloof from the service of the Lord. If you do that then you will suffer. But if you be engaged in the transcendental loving service of the Lord, then you will be happy. This is the philosophy. Now if you do not understand this philosophy. I have already given you the example. Now what is your saying? What do you want to say about this things?

Indian (1): Swamiji. It is your own philosophy then one must sit down . . . (indistinct) . . . a particular . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: No, no why sit down. You have to give service to the Lord, where is the question of sit down? Why do you say like that?

Indian (1): (indistinct) . . . these things . . . (indistinct) . . . service to the God.

Prabhupāda: Why not? If I say that you do this, all my disciples are doing. You do this, they are doing. That is service.

Indian (1): So we can't take ourselves . . . (indistinct) . . . representative of God. We can do what the God . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: What you mean by representative of God? Do you know who is representative of God?

Indian (1): Nobody. We are everybody others are either nobody . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Do you know what is the meaning of representative?

Indian (1): Representative means what God expects or what our . . .

Prabhupāda: What God expects, you know?

Indian (1): God expects that we should be so much vigil. We should be of certain nature, if we can, we can do or follow our own soul we can be. We can try to become nearer to God by our good doings and we should not be so much . . .

Prabhupāda: What is your good doings?

Indian (1): Good doings?

Prabhupāda: What do you mean by good doings?

Indian (1): Not to hurt others.

Prabhupāda: Then why you are killing animals?

Indian (1): We do not.

Prabhupāda: Why don't you struggle. Give service to the Lord. At least you do something for God.

Indian (1): I don't take meat.

Prabhupāda: You don't take meat but if you think that animals should not be. Slaughtered, if you do not understand any other philosophy, you can stop it. You can try. That is a struggle. Now to representative, to become representative of God you say that. You cannot say that you are representative of God. That was only . . . (indistinct) . . . so whom do you accept as representative of God?

Indian (1): Simply given . . . (indistinct) . . . God is the representative.

Prabhupāda: Then how do you say, that you cannot claim yourself as representative.

Indian (1): It is not you! It is not you! You . . . (indistinct) . . . nobody can claim.

Prabhupāda: That's all right. Why one does not claim? Why one cannot claim as representative of God? What is the reason?

Indian (1): Even God doesn't claim that he reveals God. Why you should claim that you are representative of God?

Prabhupāda: Who? Who is that God? Who says: "I am not God." Who has done that?

Indian (1): Nobody says that, "I am God."

Prabhupāda: Eh?

Prabhupāda: Nobody says: "I am God."

Prabhupāda: Nobody says—but Kṛṣṇa says.

Indian (1): Kṛṣṇa. Kṛṣṇa has told a different meaning.

Prabhupāda: Eh?

Indian (1): Kṛṣṇa . . .

Prabhupāda: Do you know that meaning?

Indian (1): He said about the karma.

Prabhupāda: What does he say? What does he say? Just quote from Bhagavad-gītā.

Indian (1): He, He, He, He may claim to be God but you are so angry to be representative.

Prabhupāda: Why not?

Indian (1): Tell you?

Prabhupāda: Yes. You do not know. You do not know.

Indian (1): . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda Yes. He said

na ca tasmān manuṣyeṣu
kaścin me priya-kṛttamaḥ
(BG 18.69)

Whoever teaches the philosophy of Bhagavad-gītā. Nobody is dearer than him. Therefore he is representative.

Devotee: Sarva-dharmān parityajya.

Prabhupāda: Mām ekaṁśaraṇaṁ. (BG 18.66)

So Kṛṣṇa says, sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁśaraṇaṁ vraja—and we are preaching. Sarva-dharmān parityajya—you just become Kṛṣṇa conscious. So are you not representative? Are you not speaking on behalf of Kṛṣṇa?

Indian (1): Yes.

Prabhupāda: Then you have to agree. Representative means who speaks on behalf of Kṛṣṇa. He is representative.

Indian (1): And one who follows.

Prabhupāda: He is also representative. So just clear the idea who is representative. Everything is there in the Bhagavad-gītā. Unfortunately busy, we do not read it carefully. Kṛṣṇa says: sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁśaraṇaṁ vraja. Anyone who preaches this philosophy, he is representative of Kṛṣṇa.

Devotee: Ahaṁ tvāṁ sarva-pāpebhyo mokṣayiṣyāmi māśucaḥ.

Prabhupāda: That you become Kṛṣṇa conscious, you will be happy. He is representative.

Devotee: Yes.

Prabhupāda: It is not very difficult task to become representative of Kṛṣṇa or God. Simply you have to act. So all these boys and girls who are preaching Kṛṣṇa consciousness, they are all representatives of Kṛṣṇa. Because they are speaking the same thing. Suppose if I say: "I want a glass of water." And if some of you goes immediately, "Oh Swamiji wants a glass of water." Then you are the principal. You immediately take my interest. He is thirsty, immediately one glass of water should be supplied to him. That is my interest becomes your interest. Therefore you are representative. As soon as you take my interest, as your interest. Immediately you are representative.

Indian (2): You become . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Eh?

Indian (2): You become . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: That is representative. This is intelligence. We have to know what God wants. And if we act according to that then we are representative. Not that God has to come here and give you a certificate, "Oh this is, this man is my representative." You are already representative, sarvataḥ pāṇi-pāda hasta (BG 13.14).

In Bhagavad-gītā, he has got everywhere his hands and legs. That means everywhere he has got representative. Everyone of us is representative because we are part and parcel but if I deny then it is māyā. Actually I am representative, if I deny then no. "I don't care for Kṛṣṇa," then I am in māyā.

Devotee: . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: So this Krishna Consciousness Movement is very scientific movement. Authorized movement.

Indian (2): Does it . . . (indistinct) . . . also?

Prabhupāda: Don't you see, here in action?

Indian (2): No, to say that you follow this and you do this and do not do it.

Prabhupāda: Yes.

Indian (2): This is something to propagate and to convert the God but to . . .

Prabhupāda: But that is your business to canvass for God. That is representative. What is representative? He is canvassing for God. That is all. That is representative. What do you mean by representative? If he does not canvass for God what kind of representative? He is a bogus. You have to work for God that is your principles.

Devotee: . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Eh?

Indian (2): From the hell to.

Prabhupāda: I am not King of any society. First of all you try to understand, what is mean by representation of . . . representative of God. Anyone may become representative of God. It does not mean Indian's have monopolised to become representative of God. Everyone can be.

Indian (2): . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Yes, everyone . . . Kṛṣṇa is the father of everyone, even the animals. Therefore there should be no distinction, that Indians should be representative of Kṛṣṇa and not the Americans. This is not mentioned in any where, Bhagavad-gītā.

sarva-yoniṣu kaunteya
sambhavanti mūrtayaḥ yāḥ
(BG 14.4)

In any species of life. Any form of life. I am the seed giving father. This is Bhagavad-gītā. So we are preaching the philosophy of Bhagavad-gītā, AS IT IS. Therefore we are representative of Kṛṣṇa. Is there any difficulty to understand?

Indian (2): So is it necessary that one should renounce the world.

Prabhupāda: Who says? Why do you put this question?

Indian (2): Like you have renounced all known.

Prabhupāda: Raghunātha has not renounced, he is a gṛhastha. He has got his wife but the husband and wife they are worshipped.

Indian (2): (indistinct) . . . or representative they renounce the world. They leave their family.

Prabhupāda: Renounced the world means renounce to enjoy the world. That is renunciation. I am renounced but I am sitting in a comfortable seat, even you cannot sit at your home. So what does it mean that I am renounced? But I am sitting here for service of Kṛṣṇa that's all. I do not claim that He is mine.

Indian (2): Can we not serve the God?

Prabhupāda: Why not? Everyone can.

Indian (2): But the . . . (indistinct) . . . so many people they say you will have to renounce . . . (indistinct) . . . to become Svāmī.

Prabhupāda: That is. That is a nonsense. He does not know what is God or what is.

Indian (2): (indistinct) . . . they have to put their hair . . . they have put on a different sort of dress. They are looking like.

Prabhupāda: They may do whatever they may do. You do not do it.

Indian (2): No it is necessary.

Prabhupāda: No. It is not necessary. It is not necessary you can do in this dress. If you have got any objection that is cleanliness. You should like to keep your hair. They feel comfortable by giving up this hair. They had also very big, big hair and now they're feeling comfortable. It is a question of facility. That is not very important thing.

Indian (2): (indistinct) . . . what is your experience? After hearing what you are doing, what is your experience?

Prabhupāda: That you can understand the experience was very bad.

Indian (2): (indistinct) . . . otherwise how did you tell me? Why . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: That is not very intelligent question.

Indian (2): No . . . (indistinct) . . . (break)

Prabhupāda: Established United Nations organisation. Hasti and they are. They are distracting actually there is no. Simply increasing fighting.

Indian (2): . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: And therefore when there were. Whenever there is fighting the young men are called. So therefore they are disappointed. What is this? They speak of thieves, nonsense and they are always calling us for fighting. Is it not the cause of disappointment? There is no practical proposition by all these rascals scientists and politicians. They are simply bluffing. Therefore young men have become disappointed. So this bluffing business should be stopped. Genuine things should be taken. That is Bhagavad-gītā.

Indian (2): But Swamiji . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Eh?

Indian (2): Only . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: No, why you interpret science? They are doing practically.

Indian (2): Here?

Prabhupāda: That's all.

Indian (2): . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Eh?

Indian (2): . . . (indistinct)

Haṁsadūta: We are not sitting idle. Just chanting . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda:(break) So we are not concerned with the requirement. We are concerned with the teachings, teachings of the Bhagavad-gītā.

Indian (2): (indistinct) . . . Bhagavad-gītā.

Indian (1): . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: My question is, that you are discussing Bhagavad-gītā, about 25 years and what is your practical result? That is my question.

Indian (1): (indistinct) . . . Bhagavad-gītā.

Prabhupāda: Eh?

Indian (1): (indistinct) . . . Bhagavad-gītā.

Prabhupāda: What is that?

Indian (1): . . . (indistinct)

Audience: (laughter)

Prabhupāda: Just see the position. Now you understand?

Indian (2): Yes.

Prabhupāda: The same thing which I explained. That Bhagavad-gītā means minus Kṛṣṇa. One, zero, zero, zero, zero, that's a balance and without that one simply zeros. Imagine however any number of zeros their value is zero. Similarly Bhagavad-gītā without Kṛṣṇa consciousness it is all zero. That means for the last 35 years you are dealing with zeros. I must tell you frankly. You do not know what is Kṛṣṇa . . . and Bhagavad-gītā means Kṛṣṇa. So you have carefully avoided Kṛṣṇa.

Devotee: . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: (laughter) Eh? That is the going on everywhere. There are so many Gītā Bhavan's all over the country. Where there is no understanding of Kṛṣṇa. And Bhagavad-gītā Kṛṣṇa is canvassing, I am this, I am this, I am this, I am this, I am this. So just try to understand what kind of Bhagavad-gītā you are reading. There are so many scholars of Bhagavad-gītā all over the world in institutions for preaching Bhagavad-gītā. But everywhere I go—minus Kṛṣṇa. Finished business.

So this is the first time in the history of the world at least that we are preaching Kṛṣṇa is everything in the Bhagavad-gītā . . . here also the same thing there is one idol speaker and so many dolls of different demigods and none of the members practically know thoroughly what is Kṛṣṇa. Neither the Kṛṣṇa's instruction is followed: mām ekaṁśaraṇaṁ vraja (BG 18.66).

If one was to follow mām ekaṁ kṛṣṇa, then why so many dolls and pictures?

(pause)

And we have started this Krishna Consciousness Movement—all the members they do not know anything but Kṛṣṇa. You see practically. Just see the difference of preaching of this Krishna Consciousness Movement and others dealing with Bhagavad-gītā. Now try to understand.

Indian (2): . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Eh?

Indian (2): Swamiji . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: They are not doing anything. Neither understand. Do they understand what is Kṛṣṇa? They simply take advantage of the popular book of Bhagavad-gītā, that's all. Gandhi dealt in politics. Of course even in Bhagavad-gītā there is politics also. But he wanted to introduce nonviolence. He was understood to be a great devotee of Bhagavad-gītā. But where is Bhagavad-gītā in nonviolence?

Indian (2): . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Kṛṣṇa you'll see so many pictures in our book. Kṛṣṇa is engaged in violence. So many demons are being killed. Personally He's killing. And He says: paritrāṇāya sādhūnāṁn vināśāya ca duṣkṛtāḥ (BG 4.8).

"To kill the duṣkṛtaḥ," and He is practically doing that. So where is the question of Kṛṣṇa's life, nonviolence? When He was child He committed violence, immediately.

Devotee: . . . (indistinct)

Indian (2): . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Not different cinemas.

Indian (2): . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Sohi-vit. And in. And His enemies also found in the very beginning of His coming out from the womb of His mother. Kaṁsa was ready to kill Him. So He has got enemies from the very beginning of His life and He has begun killing from the beginning of His life. All the enemies He perturbed. So how you can prove that Kṛṣṇa was non-violent? But Gandhi took that, "I shall prove nonviolence from Bhagavad-gītā." That means he misled, Bhagavad-gītā.

If you want to do something which is not, then you should misinform people. This is this, this is that. If you receive a wood and if you want to prove that it is gold. Then you have to make some propaganda, false propaganda. That's all. Because actually it is wood. So how can you prove that it is gold? That means you have to make some false propaganda and make wood so they will accept it as gold. Similarly Kṛṣṇa is full of violence and if from the life of Kṛṣṇa you want to prove nonviolence. That means you have to make false propaganda. That is being done.

So if you are actually . . . my request to you is that for the last 45 years I may tell you frankly that they are simply wasted. If you want actually to derive some benefit from Bhagavad-gītā, then this now here. Don't be misguided. That is my request. Why you should be misguided? When you have got this genuine knowledge of God as Bhagavad-gītā. Why you should be misguided? Why you should be allowed to be misguided? That is my request. People are searching after God, you're doubtful about God, in the presence of Bhagavad-gītā. How much foolishness it is.

If the thing's present and if you say: "I don't find it." Then how much foolishness it is? If the light is there and if you say: "I am in darkness. I do not find the light." Then you become . . . what is called? Owl. Owl, although there is day and there is sun, he does not know. That there is sun and there is light. It is owl's philosophy. Frog philosophy, owl's philosophy. Eh? Owl in the presence of shine, sun, he close eyes and he says: "No, there is no sun. There is no light." In the name of Bhagavad-gītā this owl philosophy is going on. And sometimes frog philosophy is going on.

Indian (2): (laughs) naturally.

Prabhupāda: Yes. The frog philosophy, you know?

Indian (2): Yes.

Prabhupāda: What is that?

Indian (2): The well is the whole world.

Prabhupāda: No frog philosophy. Do you know frog?

Indian (2): That I know.

Prabhupāda: Eh? That if you. It has got a philosophy. That is called frog philosophy. What is that?

Indian (2): It doesn't consider anything else than the well.

Prabhupāda: That is the well. Yes. He is trying to understand Atlantic ocean from within the well. So what he will understand? He's simply measuring, "Ah, Atlantic ocean may be so big, so big, so big and then he becomes . . . what is called? . . . (indistinct) . . . puzzled. You see? And similarly people are thinking, "I am God, I am God, I am God." Now this philosophy is going on. Somebody is saying, "God is dead. There is no God, or gone." And somebody is saying: "I am God, you are God, everyone God." So practically the same thing. This is frog philosophy. And in the presence of God if one says: "That there is no God." That is called owl's philosophy.

So we should not be misled by this owl's philosophy and frog's philosophy. We should follow the real philosophy and then it will be benefited. Why these people say: "There is no God?" In the presence of Kṛṣṇa. What is their reason? Can you say? Why people say: "That there is no God?" Can you say? Can anyone of you say? What do you think?

Mātājī: I . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Eh?

Mātājī: I personally think . . . (indistinct) . . . name Kṛṣṇa or Rāma . . . (indistinct) . . . they are the Supreme Power . . . (indistinct) . . . Kṛṣṇa.

Prabhupāda: You know that Supreme Power?

Mātājī: Yes.

Prabhupāda: It is not Kṛṣṇa?

Mātājī: (indistinct) . . . Kṛṣṇa . . . (indistinct) . . . Kṛṣṇa. But then . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Do you accept Kṛṣṇa as God?

Mātājī: (indistinct) . . . God . . . (indistinct) . . . the Supreme Power is Kṛṣṇa. Whatever name . . . (indistinct) . . . but there is a power.

Prabhupāda: I mean to say, that have you got any objection to accept Kṛṣṇa as the Supreme Power?

Mātājī: No, no objection.

Prabhupāda: That is my point.

Mātājī: I accept . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: (laughs) there is somebody. That's nice proposition. But if that somebody is Kṛṣṇa whether you have got any objection? Not that I am certain somebody.

Mātājī: . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: To say, "Somebody must be my father?" Because I am born. Why I do not know who is my father? Is that very good intelligence? Your proposition.

Mātājī: (indistinct) . . . father.

Prabhupāda: That is a fact, that is a fact.

Mātājī: (indistinct) . . . I have father.

Prabhupāda: Yes.

Mātājī: And my father made me . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Yes. So if you do not know that. Then your knowledge is imperfect. If you simply think, "Yes because I am born. There is. Must be there is father." That's nice. But I do not know the name of father. That's very good intelligence?

Mātājī: No, no.

Prabhupāda: Then?

Mātājī: I have . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: No first of all you answer this.

Mātājī: . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Do you accept that there is a father? Suppose you are born a posthumous child, you have never seen your father. Since the birth. But when you are grown-up you know there must be some father otherwise how I am born? But if you say I do not know the name of my father. Is that very good intelligence?

Mātājī: No it is not . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Then? So how you can say that there is some God but I do not know what is his name.

Mātājī: No I know his name . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Eh?

Indian (2): (indistinct) . . . how can you say that . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: No, if you know from your mother. You might have not seen your father but your mother knows exactly what is your father. Therefore you have to learn from your mother what is the name of your father. You may be posthumous child while you are in the womb of your mother your father might have died. I am giving an example. So after your birth you might have not seen your father but that does not mean you should not know about your father. Does it mean that because you have not seen your father you could not know anything and everything of your father? Is that a good philosophy?

Mātājī: No.

Prabhupāda: Similarly you might have not seen God but you must know everything of God. That is intelligence. Then how you can know it? That is the point. Just like you have to know from a reliable authority your mother. Who knows actually what is . . . who is your father. You cannot know about your father from any other man. Except your mother. If your mother says that your father was like this, your father's teacher. This is the coat of your father. And he was such and such nice gentleman his name was this, he was doing like that.

Then you know everything even though you have not seen your father. So similarly, it is not necessary that you have to see Kṛṣṇa or God personally. But there is a source to know about Him. That is the Vedas. You cannot evade to understand about your father simply because you have not seen. That is not argument. You cannot say that because you have not seen God therefore I do not believe in God or I do not know anything about God. That is not intelligence.

Mātājī: . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Yes.

Mātājī: (indistinct) . . . there is mother to answer the question right. But here there are so many, I mean to say . . .

Prabhupāda: What? No. There cannot be so many.

Mātājī: . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Yes.

Mātājī: . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: I have discovered it.

Mātājī: . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Mother means—right mother.

Mātājī: . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Mother does not mean false mother.

Mātājī: No, no I don't mean that.

Prabhupāda: Yes.

Mātājī: But how do we know . . . (indistinct) . . . but we are . . . (indistinct) . . . don't know. Who should answer the question if he is disentitled.

Prabhupāda: Yes. Your answer to your question is very intelligent. Therefore we call vedamātā. Vedamātā have you heard this word?

Mātājī: No.

Prabhupāda: Veda. The knowledge of Vedas is considered as mother.

Mātājī: Yes that I know.

Prabhupāda: So you have to learn from the Vedas. Vedamātā. Just like you learn about your father from your real mother. Similarly the original father Kṛṣṇa, you have to learn from the Vedas. Because Kṛṣṇa says, vedaiś ca sarvair aham eva vedyam (BG 15.15).

(I am seated in everyone's heart, and from Me come remembrance, knowledge and forgetfulness. By all the Vedas am I to be known; indeed I am the compiler of Vedānta, and I am the knower of the Vedas.)

The Vedas gives . . . knowledge about Me. Through Veda one has to learn Kṛṣṇa. Therefore we take Vedas and the followers of Vedānta and the commentary on Vedānta. Then you know what is God. Vedānta says that the father God is the supreme father who has begotten everything, janmādy asya yataḥ (Vedānta Sūtra 1.1.2).

From whom everything has taken birth. Just like father gives birth to the child. Or the state or the anything in the family. Similarly the Parabrahma, Supreme Brahma is He who has begotten everything. All these living entities, this material world—and that is explained in the Bhagavad-gītā. That these five elements; bhūmir āpo 'nalo vāyuḥ khaṁbuddhir mano eva . . . iti bhinnā prakṛtir aṣṭadhā (BG 7.4).

Me, that is Kṛṣṇa's. And again he says: apareyam itas tv viddhi me prakṛtiṁ parām jīva-bhūtāṁ mahā-bāho yayedaṁ dhāryate jagat (BG 7.5).

There is another prakṛti, that is jīva. So what is this material world? These five elements, mind intelligence and the jīva. That's all. And these things are prakṛti of Kṛṣṇa, wife or strī of Kṛṣṇa. And Kṛṣṇa is the father. And prakṛti is the mother and everything is born out of Kṛṣṇa and this prakṛti.

sarva-yoniṣu kaunteya
sambhavanti mūrtayaḥ yāḥ
tāsāṁ mahad yonir brahma
ahaṁ bīja-pradaḥ pitā
(BG 14.4)

I am the seed giving father. So how you cannot (break) . . . simply fighting, "Oh, I am Hindu and you are Moslem. Your religion is bad, my religion is better." You see? What you have learned from your religion? What is the principal of religion? There is none. Dharmaṁ tu sākṣād bhagavat-praṇītam (SB 6.3.19) that Bhāgavata says.

Simply, religion means the course of God. That is religion. There is no God, God is dead, God is impersonal. What does it mean by the course? That you make your own course? And that is accepted as religion. They bring forward some artificial avatāras and everyone is bluffed. In this way the whole religious principles are being spoiled in the world. So we have to fight against that. That is Kṛṣṇa consciousness. So don't give any credit to any person because he has deviated from the religious principles. Religious principles means to obey the orders of God—that is religion. They do not know what is God or what is the order of God. Even there is no other they do not. They do not obey. They disobey. And still they claim that I am guru. Nobody is perfect.

So our mission is very grave and it should be act sincerly and then we get power from Kṛṣṇa. If we act really as representative of Kṛṣṇa then we will feel His power. So generally we utilize religion as a means of livelihood. That is going on. Eh? That is going on . . . anywhere all over the world, still because the natural tendency, kṛṣṇa-bhakti nitya-siddha, kṛṣṇa-bhakti (CC Madhya 22.107).

Affection for Kṛṣṇa or God there is everywhere. And, therefore whenever there is some religious talk people gather, people like it. But these leaders, religious leaders they fight, for their livelihood. Therefore it is degraded.

Haṁsadūta: . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Eh?

Haṁsadūta: . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: That they . . . they do not know. They are not bad men. I can understand that old man. He is not a bad man and this, what is called? Bhogaji, vairagi, he also not a bad man. But he's not . . . they are not properly guided. They have learned some hodgepodge. That's all. That is going on everywhere. Just like yesterday two boys came.

Haṁsadūta: Yes.

Prabhupāda: And . . . (indistinct) . . . everything. For the last 45 years. (laughter) they are conducting . . . (indistinct) . . . and I tell him . . . (indistinct) . . . that you do not know anything. And they admit it. How they can know? Unless they hear from the representative of Kṛṣṇa they cannot understand. It is not possible. That is going on all over the world . . . and the people say that's nice. Then you are the . . . (indistinct) . . . challenging like that, "Then are you the only representative of Kṛṣṇa's present?" So I said, "Yes." Yes. Because I know because I am sincere representative, representing my Guru Mahārāja. Therefore I am clear representative of Kṛṣṇa. That's all . . . that telling they cannot do . . .

(pause) Now begin. (end)