Go to Vaniquotes | Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanimedia


Vanisource - the complete essence of Vedic knowledge


721213 - Lecture BG 07.01 - Ahmedabad: Difference between revisions

m (1 revision(s))
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{BGL_Header|{{PAGENAME}}}}
[[Category:1972 - Lectures]]
<div class="lec_code">721213BG.AHM</div>
[[Category:1972 - Lectures and Conversations]]
[[Category:1972 - Lectures, Conversations and Letters]]
[[Category:1972-12 - Lectures, Conversations and Letters]]
[[Category:Lectures - India]]
[[Category:Lectures - India, Ahmedabad]]
[[Category:Lectures, Conversations and Letters - India]]
[[Category:Lectures, Conversations and Letters - India, Ahmedabad]]
[[Category:Lectures - Bhagavad-gita As It Is]]
[[Category:BG Lectures - Chapter 07|0701]]
[[Category:Audio Files 45.01 to 60.00 Minutes]]
<div style="float:left">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=Category:Lectures - by Date]]'''[[:Category:Lectures - by Date|Lectures by Date]], [[:Category:1972 - Lectures|1972]]'''</div>
{{RandomImage}}




<div class="code">721213BG-AHMEDABAD - December 13, 1972 - 54:27 Minutes</div>




Prabhupāda:  
<mp3player>https://s3.amazonaws.com/vanipedia/full/1972/721213BG-AHMEDABAD.mp3</mp3player>


<div class="lec_verse">
śrī-bhagavān uvāca<br />
mayy āsakta-manāḥ pārtha<br />
yogaṁ yuñjan mad-āśrayaḥ<br />
asaṁśayam samagraṁ māṁ<br />
yathā jñāsyasi tac chṛṇu<br />
[[BG 7.1]] </div>


Prabhupāda:


So by the end of the Sixth Chapter, Kṛṣṇa has explained the aṣṭa, aṣṭāṅga-yoga-siddhi. Aṣṭāṅga-yoga-siddhi, that yoginām api sarveṣāṁ mad-gatenāntar-ātmanā [[BG 6.47]] . Always who is thinking of Kṛṣṇa within himself, śraddhāvān, with faith and knowledge, he is first-class yogi. So how this first-class yoga system helps me? Because the other yoga systems, they will disagree, that "Simply by thinking of Kṛṣṇa within one's heart, how one becomes perfect?" That is explained from the Seventh Chapter of Bhagavad-gītā, how simply by understanding Kṛṣṇa, you become well aware of everything, this yoga system. In the Vedas also it is stated, kasmin tu bhagavo vijñāte sarvam idaṁ vijñātaṁ bhavati. If you, if you simply understand Kṛṣṇa, then you know everything. Kṛṣṇa is the root of everything. Therefore Kṛṣṇa says, śrī-bhagavān uvāca.
:''mayy āsakta-manāḥ pārtha''
:''yogaṁ yuñjan mad-āśrayaḥ''
:''asaṁśayam samagraṁ māṁ''
:''yathā jñāsyasi tac chṛṇu''
:([[BG 7.1 (1972)|BG 7.1]])


We should always remember that this Bhagavad-gītā is being spoken by the Supreme Personality of Godhead. So no more better authority. And God is speaking about Himself. Otherwise, by speculation you cannot understand God. That is not possible. You have to hear from God Himself about God.
So by the end of the Sixth Chapter, Kṛṣṇa has explained the ''aṣṭa, aṣṭāṅga-yoga-siddhi. Aṣṭāṅga-yoga-siddhi,'' that ''yoginām api sarveṣāṁ mad-gatenāntar-ātmanā'' ([[BG 6.47 (1972)|BG 6.47]]): always who is thinking of Kṛṣṇa within himself, ''śraddhāvān'', with faith and knowledge, he is first-class ''yogī''.


<div class="lec_verse">
So how this first-class ''yoga'' system helps me? Because the other ''yoga'' system, they will disagree that, "Simply by thinking of Kṛṣṇa within one's heart, how one becomes perfect?" That is explained from the Seventh Chapter of ''Bhagavad-gītā'', how simply by understanding Kṛṣṇa you become well aware of everything, this ''yoga'' system. In the ''Vedas'' also it is stated, ''yasmin vijñāte sarvam idaṁ vijñātaṁ bhavati'' (''Muṇḍaka Upaniṣad'' 1.3). If you, if you simply understand Kṛṣṇa, then you know everything.
athāpi te deva padāmbuja-dvaya-<br />
prasāda-leśānugṛhīta eva hi<br />
jānāti tattvaṁ bhagavan-mahimno<br />
na cānya eko 'pi ciraṁ vicinvan<br />
[[SB 10.14.29]] </div>


Kṛṣṇa is the root of everything. Therefore Kṛṣṇa says, ''śrī-bhagavān uvāca''. We should always remember that this ''Bhagavad-gītā'' is being spoken by the Supreme Personality of Godhead. So no more better authority. And God is speaking about Himself. Otherwise, by speculation you cannot understand God. That is not possible. You have to hear from God Himself about God.


"A person who has got little favor," athāpi te deva padāmbu..., "little favor from the lotus feet of Your Lordship, he," jānāti tattvam, "he knows what is tattva, what is the Absolute Truth." Athāpi te deva padāmbuja-dvaya-prasāda-leśānu..., prasāda-leśa: Little favor, not all. Prasāda-leśānugṛhīta eva hi jānāti tattvam, na ca anya ciraṁ vicinvan. Others may go on speculating for years and years. It is not possible to understand. And similarly, in the Brahma-saṁhitā, another Vedic literature, it is said, panthās tu koṭi-śata-vatsara-sampragamyo vāyor athāpi manaso muni-puṅgavānām [Bs. 5.34] . Muni-puṅgavānām, great saintly persons, sages, if they travel for millions of years... Panthās tu koṭi-śata-vatsara. Koṭi, again multiplied by hundreds and hundreds. Vāyor athāpi, on the airplane of air. Not this metal airplane, but actually air airplane or by the airplane of mind. Mind speed, we know. Mind can run within a second many thousands of miles, immediately. Suppose I am sitting here. So I have got my apartment in Los Angeles, ten thousand miles away. I can immediately go... This is called mind-speed. So with the mind speed, with the velocity of air, if one runs on, to find out the Kṛṣṇa planet, or Kṛṣṇa, still, avicintya-tattva, still, it is inconceivable tattva.
:''athāpi te deva padāmbuja-dvaya-''
:''prasāda-leśānugṛhīta eva hi''
:''jānāti tattvaṁ bhagavan'' . . .
:''na cānya eko 'pi ciraṁ vicinvan''
:([[SB 10.14.29|SB 10.14.29]])


<div class="lec_verse">
"A person who has got little favor," ''athāpi te deva padāmbu'' . . . "little favor from the lotus feet of Your Lordship, he," ''jānāti tattvam,'' "he knows what is ''tattva'', what is the Absolute Truth." ''Athāpi te deva padāmbuja-dvaya-prasāda-leśānu'' . . . ''prasāda-leśa'': little favor, not all. ''Prasāda-leśānugṛhīta eva hi jānāti tattvam'','' na ca anya ciraṁ vicinvan.'' Others may go on speculating for years and years, it is not possible to understand.
panthās tu koṭi-śata-vatsara-sampragamyo<br />
vāyor athāpi manaso muni-puṅgavānām<br />
so 'py asti yat-prapada-sīmny avicintya-tattve<br />
govindam ādi-puruṣaṁ tam ahaṁ bhajāmi<br />
[Bs. 5.34] </div>


So similarly, in the ''Brahmā-saṁhitā,'' another Vedic literature, it is said, ''panthās tu koṭi-śata-vatsara-sampragamyo vāyor athāpi manaso muni-puṅgavānām'' (Bs. 5.34). ''Muni-puṅgavānām'', great saintly persons, sages, if they travel for millions of years . . . ''panthās tu koṭi-śata-vatsara. Koṭi,'' again multiplied by hundreds and hundreds. ''Vāyor athāpi'': on the airplane of air.
Not this metal airplane, but actually air airplane or by the airplane of mind. Mind speed we know. Mind can run within a second many thousands of miles, immediately. Suppose I am sitting here. So I have got my apartment in Los Angeles, ten thousand miles away. I can immediately go . . . this is called mind-speed.
So with the mind speed, with the velocity of air, if one runs on, to find out the Kṛṣṇa planet, or Kṛṣṇa, still, ''avicintya-tattva'', still, it is inconceivable ''tattva''.
:''panthās tu koṭi-śata-vatsara-sampragamyo''
:''vāyor athāpi manaso muni-puṅgavānām''
:''so 'py asti yat-prapada-sīmny avicintya-tattve''
:''govindam ādi-puruṣaṁ tam ahaṁ bhajāmi''
:(Bs. 5.34)


Govinda is very, very difficult to understand by mental speculation, philosophical theses. Philosophical theses, speculation, without religion is simply waste of time. And religion without philosophical basis is sentiment. They must be combined together.
Govinda is very, very difficult to understand by mental speculation, philosophical theses. Philosophical theses, speculation, without religion is simply waste of time. And religion without philosophical basis is sentiment. They must be combined together.


So Bhagavad-gītā is that, religion combined with philosophy. If you simply take philosophy, it is dry speculation. No juice. Carvita-carvaṇānām: "Chewing the chewed." There is no benefit. And if you take, simply take religion without basis of philosophy, then it is fanaticism. That's all. So both should be combined. Religion based on philosophy and logic, that is religion. So that combination is Bhagavad-gītā. So here in the Seventh Chapter, beginning, opening chapter, it is said, bhagavān uvāca. You are searching after God. Now here is God Himself speaking. So recognized God by all sages: Vyāsadeva, Nārada, Asita. And later on by Rāmānujācārya, by Śaṅkarācārya, by Madhvācārya, by Viṣṇu Svāmī, by Caitanya Mahāprabhu, and then our Guru Mahārāja. So our method is very simple: evaṁ paramparā-prāptam imaṁ rājarṣayo viduḥ [[BG 4.2]] . So we accept this paramparā system. I may not know what is God, but because my predecessors, ācāryas, confirm it, the "Here is Bhagavān," we accept it. That's all. We save so much trouble by mental speculation. We accept the paramparā system. Therefore... And we get the result. So that is the way.
So ''Bhagavad-gītā'' is that: religion combined with philosophy. If you simply take philosophy, it is dry speculation, no juice. ''Carvita-carvaṇānām'': "Chewing the chewed." There is no benefit. And if you take . . . simply take religion without basis of philosophy, then it is fanaticism. That's all. So both should be combined. Religion based on philosophy and logic, that is religion. So that combination is ''Bhagavad-gītā''.
 
So here in the Seventh Chapter, beginning, opening chapter, it is said, ''bhagavān uvāca''. You are searching after God. Now here is God Himself speaking. So recognized God by all sages: Vyāsadeva, Nārada, Asita, and later on by Rāmānujācārya, by Śaṅkarācārya, by Madhvācārya, by Viṣṇu Svāmī, by Caitanya Mahāprabhu, and then our Guru Mahārāja.
 
So our method is very simple, ''evaṁ paramparā-prāptam imaṁ rājarṣayo viduḥ'' ([[BG 4.2 (1972)|BG 4.2]]). So we accept this ''paramparā'' system. I may not know what is God, but because my predecessors, ''ācāryas'', confirm it, the "Here is Bhagavān," we accept it. That's all. We save so much trouble by mental speculation. We accept the ''paramparā'' system, therefore. And we get the result. So that is the way.
 
Now here, not only the ''paramparā'' system . . . the ''paramparā'' system begins from Kṛṣṇa. As Kṛṣṇa says in the Fourth Chapter, ''imaṁ vivasvate yogaṁ proktavān aham avyayam'' ([[BG 4.1 (1972)|BG 4.1]]): "I spoke first to the sun god." It is not said: "First." Many times He has said to many predominating deities. But in this era . . . this is called the age of Vaivasvata Manu. There are fourteen Manus in one day of Brahmā. So Vaivasvata Manu is the eighth Manu.
 
That means we are passing through the midday of this era, ''manvantara''. There is fourteen Manus in one day of Brahmā, and this era is called Vaivasvata Manu, because he is the son of Vivasvān. And that Vivasvān is given reference in the Fourth Chapter: ''imaṁ vivasvate yogaṁ proktavān aham avyayam'' ([[BG 4.1 (1972)|BG 4.1]]). So if you simply calculate the age of Manu it becomes forty millions of years.
 
So ''Bhagavad-gītā'' is not a new theses. It is coming from time immemorial. So Kṛṣṇa is the original preceptor. So here Kṛṣṇa again personally speaking, the authority, personally . . . out of compassion and friendship, love to Arjuna, He's speaking directly to Arjuna. And Arjuna understood Him the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
 
''Paraṁ brahma paraṁ dhāma pavitraṁ paramaṁ bhavān, puruṣam'' ([[BG 10.12-13 (1972)|BG 10.12]]). ''Puruṣam. Puruṣam'' means person. He's not imperson. Imperson is the, another feature of the person. ''Brahmaṇaḥ ahaṁ pratiṣṭhā''. Kṛṣṇa says that, "The ''brahma-jyotir,'' impersonal Brahman, that is situated upon Me." ''Ahaṁ pratiṣṭhā.'' Just like we are sitting on this platform. This is ''pratiṣṭhā''. Similarly, the ''brahma-jyotir'' is situated on the person of Kṛṣṇa.
 
The person is the ultimate understanding of the Absolute Truth, not the impersonal feature. That is preliminary understanding or imperfect understanding. There is ''brahma-jyotir''. Just like we are experiencing the sunshine. The sunshine is also experience of the sun god, but it is imperfect understanding. It is not perfect understanding. If you want to understand the sun god, then you have to penetrate through the sunshine and reach the sun planet. And then, if . . . you are able to see the predominating deity of the sun planet, whose name is Vivasvān.
 
Similarly, the whole material creation is a part of the ''brahma-jyotir. Sarvaṁ khalv idaṁ brahma''. So you have to penetrate . . . in the ''Īśopaniṣad'' it is said that, requested, it is requesting the . . . that, "You kindly wind up Your ''brahma-jyotir'' so can . . . I can see Your face rightly." So ultimately, there is person. ''Tattva-vastu''.
 
:''vadanti tat tattva-vidas''
:''tattvaṁ yaj jñānam advayam''
:''brahmeti paramātmeti''
:''bhagavān iti śabdyate''
:([[SB 1.2.11|SB 1.2.11]])
 
This is the version of ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam.''
 
So Brahman realization is for the persons who are trying to understand the Absolute Truth by philosophical speculation. That is the understanding. Similarly, the localized Paramātmā feature is realized by the ''yogīs. Dhyānāvasthita-tad-gatena manasā paśyanti yaṁ yoginaḥ'' ([[SB 12.13.1|SB 12.13.1]]). And the devotees, they realized directly the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Bhagavān, ''ṣaḍ-aiśvarya bhagavān'', with full richness, full reputation, full strength, full knowledge, full renunciation. This is the meaning of Bhagavān. I have already explained. So that Bhagavān is speaking.
 
So ''mayy āsakta-manāḥ pārtha'' ([[BG 7.1 (1972)|BG 7.1]]): "Those who have developed attachment for Me, "''mayy āsakta'', "only attached to Kṛṣṇa . . ." That is Kṛṣṇa consciousness: always thinking of Kṛṣṇa. ''Mayy āsakta-manāḥ pārtha yogaṁ yuñjan mad-āśrayaḥ.'' This is ''yoga''. It is already explained by the end of the Sixth Chapter. ''Yoginām api sarveṣāṁ mad-gatenāntar-ātmanā'' ([[BG 6.47 (1972)|BG 6.47]]). One who has developed attachment for Kṛṣṇa, he has come to perfection simply by developing. And this development of attachment is possible by this ''arcana-vidhi.''
 
Just like our rising early in the morning, offering ''maṅgalārātrika'', then changing the dress, garlanding, dressing, so many things. From morning, four, to . . . up to night at ten o'clock, there is program. That is real temple worship. Not that the temple is closed whole day and night, and the ''pūjārī'' goes for five minutes and bells the bell, again close. No. There is system. ''Śrī-vigrahārādhana-nitya-nānā-śṛṅgāra-tan-mandira-mār janādau''. So, so many activities in temple worship.
 
So for the ''kaniṣṭha-adhikārī,'' neophytes, those who are serious to become, to awaken his attachment for Kṛṣṇa, they must take to this ''arcana-mārga.'' This is called ''arcana-mārga'', temple worship. Everyone can establish a small temple in his house, and he can begin family-wise: himself, his wife, his children. That is wanted. This Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement wants to see that every house has become a temple of Kṛṣṇa. That is our program. ''Mayy āsakta'' . . . just to increase the attachment for Kṛṣṇa.
 
That is needed, especially for the ''gṛhasthas''. For the householders . . . still in India, there are many respectable families, they are maintaining a small temple. Therefore Kṛṣṇa says, ''śucīnāṁ śrīmatāṁ gehe yoga-bhraṣṭo sanjāyate'' ([[BG 6.41 (1972)|BG 6.41]]). ''Yoga-bhraṣṭa'', this ''yogaṁ yuñjan mad-āśrayaḥ'', this ''bhakti-yoga,'' one who could not finish the cent percent ''bhakti-yoga'' in one life, at least he's guaranteed to have next life as a human being. Because Kṛṣṇa says, ''śucīnāṁ śrīmatāṁ gehe yoga-bhraṣṭo sanjāyate. Śucīnām. Śucīnām'' means first-class ''brāhmin'', Vaiṣṇava. They are called ''śuci.'' The ''śuci'', the, just the opposite word is ''muci. Muci'' means most nasty habit, and ''śuci'' means most cleansed habit.
 
So one poet said that ''śuci haya muci haya yadi kṛṣṇa tyaje'' and ''muci haya śuci haya yadi kṛṣṇa bhaje'': "If one becomes Kṛṣṇa conscious, even though he's born in the family of ''muci'', he becomes ''śuci''. And even though one is born in the family of ''śuci'', ''brāhmin'', if he rejects Kṛṣṇa, he becomes ''muci''." So ''muci haya śuci haya yadi kṛṣṇa bhaje'' and ''śuci haya muci haya yadi kṛṣṇa tyaje''. This is the . . .
 
So the highest perfection of life is to awaken our dormant Kṛṣṇa consciousness. That is the highest perfection of life. Everyone has got Kṛṣṇa consciousness dormant. It is covered by the influence of ''māyā''. By the influence of ''māyā''. That is also stated in the ''Caitanya-caritāmṛta'' that:
 
:''nitya-siddha kṛṣṇa-bhakti 'sādhya' kabhu naya''
:''śravaṇādi-śuddha-citte karaye udaya''
:([[CC Madhya 22.107|CC Madhya 22.107]])
 
''Nitya-siddha.'' Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and we are all part and parcel of Kṛṣṇa. So therefore our relationship with Kṛṣṇa is natural. It is natural. Just like my part and parcel of the finger; so without finger, my body's imperfect. Finger must be. So the existence of finger with this body, it is natural. Similarly, to remain with Kṛṣṇa, that is our natural position, constitutional position—remain with Kṛṣṇa as cowherd boy, as ''gopī'', as Kṛṣṇa's father, Kṛṣṇa's mother, Kṛṣṇa's servant, Kṛṣṇa's trees, Kṛṣṇa's Yamunā, Kṛṣṇa's flower, Kṛṣṇa's Vṛndāvana land—remain with Kṛṣṇa in any form you like: ''śānta dāsya sākhya vātsalya mādhurya''. In any mellow, humor, you can remain with Kṛṣṇa. That is our natural position.
 
But when we try to imitate Kṛṣṇa, to become a imitation Kṛṣṇa . . . just like there are so many persons, they say, "I am Kṛṣṇa." This is ''māyā''. Immediately . . . because we trying to forget Kṛṣṇa, our relationship with Kṛṣṇa, immediately ''māyā'' captures.


Now, here, not only the paramparā system... The paramparā system begins from Kṛṣṇa. As Kṛṣṇa says in the Fourth Chapter: imaṁ vivasvate yogaṁ proktavān aham avyayam: [[BG 4.1]] "I spoke first to the sun-god." It is not said, "First." Many times He has said to many predominating deities. But in this era... This is called the age of Vaivasvata Manu. There are fourteen Manus in one day of Brahmā. So Vaivasvata Manu is the eighth Manu. That means we are passing through the midday of this era, manvantara. There is fourteen Manus in one day of Brahmā, and this era is called Vaivasvata Manu, because he is the son of Vivasvān. And that Vivasvān is given reference in the Fourth Chapter: imaṁ vivasvate yogaṁ proktavān aham avyayam [[BG 4.1]] . So if you simply calculate the age of Manu it becomes forty millions of years. So Bhagavad-gītā is not a new theses. It is coming from time immemorial. So Kṛṣṇa is the original preceptor. So here Kṛṣṇa again personally speaking. The authority, personally... Out of compassion and friendship, love to Arjuna, He's speaking directly to Arjuna. And Arjuna understood Him: the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Paraṁ brahma paraṁ dhāma pavitraṁ paramaṁ bhavān, puruṣam [[BG 4.1]] . Puruṣam. Puruṣam means person. He's not imperson. Imperson is the, another feature of the person. Brahmaṇaḥ ahaṁ pratiṣṭhā. Kṛṣṇa says that "The brahmajyoti, impersonal Brahman, that is situated upon Me." Ahaṁ pratiṣṭhā. Just like we are sitting on this platform. This is pratiṣṭhā. Similarly, the brahmajyoti is situated on the person of Kṛṣṇa. The person is the ultimate understanding of the Absolute Truth, not the impersonal feature. That is preliminary understanding or imperfect understanding. There is brahmajyoti. Just like we are experiencing the sunshine. The sunshine is also experience of the sun-god, but it is imperfect understanding. It is not perfect understanding. If you want to understand the sun-god, then you have to penetrate through the sunshine and reach the sun planet. And then, if, if, you are able to see the predominating deity of the sun planet, whose name is Vivasvān... Similarly, the whole material creation is a part of the brahmajyoti. Sarvaṁ khalv idaṁ brahma.
:''kṛṣṇa bhuliya jīva bhoga vañcha kare''
:''pāśate māyā tāre jāpaṭiyā dhare''
:(''Prema-vivarta'')


So you have to penetrate... In the Īśopaniṣad, it is said that, requested, it is requesting the, that "You kindly wind up Your brahmajyoti so can, I can see Your face rightly." So ultimately, there is person. Tattva-vastu.  
As soon as we desire to forget Kṛṣṇa, or to rebel against Kṛṣṇa that, "Why I shall serve Kṛṣṇa? I am Kṛṣṇa," immediately ''māyā'' is there, side by side. Kṛṣṇa is there. ''Apaśyat puruṣaṁ pūrṇaṁ māyāṁ ca tad-apāśrayam''. When Vyāsadeva, after getting instruction from Nārada, he wanted to write ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'', so he first of all meditated. ''Bhakti-yogena manasi, apaśyat puruṣaṁ pūrṇaṁ māyāṁ ca tad-apāśrayam'' ([[SB 1.7.4|SB 1.7.4]]). He saw both Kṛṣṇa and His illusory energy, ''apāśrayam'', on the back side.


<div class="lec_verse">
So Kṛṣṇa is never influenced by the illusory energy, ''māyā''. We become influenced by the ''māyā''. Kṛṣṇa . . . just like cloud. Cloud cannot cover the sun. It is our eyes which are covered by the cloud. We see . . . we say that: "Now the sun is covered by the cloud." No, that is not the fact. Sun is very, very big. Sun cannot be covered by cloud. It is our eyes which are covered by the cloud. Similarly, ''māyā'' . . . we are teeny part and parcel of Kṛṣṇa. Therefore we are covered by ''māyā''. Sometimes, not always. Kṛṣṇa . . . when we forget Kṛṣṇa,
vadanti tat tattva-vidas<br />
tattvaṁ yaj jñānam advayam<br />
brahmeti paramātmeti<br />
bhagavān iti śabdyate<br />
[[SB 1.2.11]] </div>


:''kṛṣṇa-bahirmukha hañā bhoga vāñchā kare''
:''nikaṭa-stha māyā tāre jāpaṭiyā dhare''
:(''Prema-vivarta'')


This is the version of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. So Brahman realization is for the persons who are trying to understand the Absolute Truth by philosophical speculation. That is the understanding. Similarly, the localized Paramātmā feature is realized by the yogis. Dhyānāvasthita-tad-gatena manasā paśyanti yaṁ yoginaḥ [[SB 12.13.1]] . And the devotees, they realized directly the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Bhagavān, ṣaḍ-aiśvarya bhagavān, with full richness, full reputation, full strength, full knowledge, full renunciation. This is the meaning of Bhagavān. I have already explained. So that Bhagavān is speaking.
As soon as we try to forget Kṛṣṇa, immediately ''māyā'' is there.


So mayy āsakta-manāḥ pārtha: "Those who have developed attachment for Me, mayy āsakta, only attached to Kṛṣṇa..." That is Kṛṣṇa consciousness, always thinking of Kṛṣṇa. Mayy āsakta-manāḥ pārtha yogaṁ yuñjan mad-āśrayaḥ. This is yoga. It is already explained by the end of the Sixth Chapter. Yoginām api sarveṣāṁ mad-gatenāntar-ātmanā [[BG 6.47]] . One who has developed attachment for Kṛṣṇa, he has come to perfection, simply by developing. And this development of attachment is possible by this arcana-vidhi. Just like our, rising early in the morning, offering maṅgalārātrika, then changing the dress, garlanding, dressing, so many things. From morning, four, to, up to night at ten o'clock, there is program. That is real temple worship. Not that the temple is closed whole day and night, and the pūjārī goes for five minutes and bells the bell, again close. No. There is system. Śrī-vigrahārādhana-nitya-nānā-śṛṅgāra-tan-mandira-mār janādau ** . So many activities in temple worship. So for the kaniṣṭha-adhikārī, neophytes, those who are serious to become, to awaken his attachment for Kṛṣṇa, they must take to this arcana-mārga. This is called arcana-mārga, temple worship. Everyone can establish a small temple in his house, and he can begin family-wise: himself, his wife, his children. That is wanted. This Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement wants to see that every house has become a temple of Kṛṣṇa. That is our program. Mayy āsakta... Just to increase the attachment for Kṛṣṇa.
Therefore the reversing process, reversing process, if we want to go back again to Kṛṣṇa, then ''daivī hy eṣā guṇamayī mama māyā duratyayā'' ([[BG 7.14 (1972)|BG 7.14]]). You cannot go back to home, back to Godhead, by your own speculation. That is not possible. ''Ciraṁ vicinvan.'' You can go on speculating to become one with God. That is another thing. But if you actually want to know God and see God, then as Kṛṣṇa says, ''mām eva ye prapadyante māyām etāṁ taranti te'' ([[BG 7.14 (1972)|BG 7.14]]): simply surrender to Kṛṣṇa and ''māyā'' will give you no more trouble. You can see Kṛṣṇa. This is the process.


That is needed, especially for the gṛhasthas, for the householders... Still in India, there are many respectable families. They are maintaining a small temple. Therefore Kṛṣṇa says, śucīnāṁ śrīmatāṁ gehe yoga-bhraṣṭo 'bhijāyate [[BG 6.41]] . Yoga-bhraṣṭa, this yogaṁ yuñjan mad-āśrayaḥ, this bhakti-yoga, one who could not finish the cent percent bhakti-yoga in one life, at least he's guaranteed to have next life as a human being. Because Kṛṣṇa says, śucīnāṁ śrīmatāṁ gehe yoga-bhraṣṭo 'bhijāyate. Śucīnām. Śucīnām means first-class brāhmaṇa, Vaiṣṇava. They are called śuci. The śuci, the, just the opposite word is muci. Muci means most nasty habit, and śuci means most cleansed habit. So one poet said that śuci haya muci haya yadi kṛṣṇa tyaje and muci haya śuci haya yadi kṛṣṇa bhaje: "If one becomes Kṛṣṇa conscious, even though he's born in the family of muci, he becomes śuci. And even though one is born in the family of śuci, brāhmaṇa, if he rejects Kṛṣṇa, he becomes muci. " So muci haya śuci haya yadi kṛṣṇa bhaje and śuci haya muci haya yadi kṛṣṇa tyaje. This is the...
Therefore Kṛṣṇa says, ''mayy āsakta-manāḥ pārtha yogam.'' To . . . this is ''yoga'' system. It is called ''bhakti-yoga. Bhakti-yoga'' system. So a neophyte devotee should be engaged in temple worship, but if he does not make further improvement, if he sticks to the simply temple worship, then he remains a ''kaniṣṭha-adhikārī'', lower-standard devotee. Lower-standard devotee. But one has to become first-standard devotee; at least, one must . . . a first-standard devotee is very high position, spiritual position. But at least we must come to the second standard. The lower standard is:


So the highest perfection of life is to awaken our dormant Kṛṣṇa consciousness. That is the highest perfection of life. Everyone has got Kṛṣṇa consciousness dormant. It is covered by the influence of māyā. By the influence of māyā. That is also stated in the Caitanya-caritāmṛta, that
:''arcāyām eva haraye''
:''pūjāṁ yaḥ śraddhayehate''
:''na tad-bhakteṣu cānyeṣu''
:''sa bhaktaḥ prākṛtaḥ smṛtaḥ''
:([[SB 11.2.47|SB 11.2.47]])


<div class="lec_verse">
''Arcā'', this ''arcā-vigraha,'' Deity, Kṛṣṇa, ''arcāyām eva haraye,'' the Deity of Kṛṣṇa, ''yaḥ pūjāṁ śraddhayā īhate'', with great devotion and according to the rules and regulation, if one performs, that is very nice. But if he does not improve, ''na tad-bhakteṣu cānyeṣu'', he does not become knowable to the devotees and other persons, then he remains a ''kaniṣṭha-adhikārī. Sa bhaktaḥ prākṛtaḥ. Prākṛta'' means in the material platform. He does not actually promoted to the spiritual platform if he simply remains.
nitya-siddha kṛṣṇa-prema 'sādhya' kabhu naya<br />
śravaṇādi-śuddha-citte karaye udaya<br />
[[CC Madhya 22.107]] </div>


Therefore along with the worship of Kṛṣṇa in the temple, this hearing should be. ''Śravaṇaṁ kīrtanam'' ([[SB 7.5.23-24|SB 7.5.23]]). Just like we are doing. We do not engage only the devotees to the temple worship, but there must be program for hearing ''Bhagavad-gītā'', ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'', the science of God. Otherwise, after some time, simply if you ring the bell, after time you'll be disgusted and the whole thing will be lost, as it has become now in India. There was no instruction about Kṛṣṇa consciousness; they simply attached to the temple and belling. And now it is now zero. Devotion is zero.


Nitya-siddha. Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and we are all part and parcel of Kṛṣṇa. So therefore our relationship with Kṛṣṇa is natural. It is natural. Just like my part and parcel of the finger; so without finger, my body's imperfect. Finger must be... So the existence of finger with this body, it is natural. Similarly, to remain with Kṛṣṇa, that is our natural position, constitutional position. Remain with Kṛṣṇa as cowherd boy, as gopī, as Kṛṣṇa's father, Kṛṣṇa's mother, Kṛṣṇa's servant, Kṛṣṇa's trees, Kṛṣṇa's Yamunā, Kṛṣṇa's flower, Kṛṣṇa's Vṛndāvana land—remain with Kṛṣṇa in any form you like. Śānta dāsya sākhya vātsalya mādhurya. In any mellow, humor, you can remain with Kṛṣṇa. That is our natural position. But when we try to imitate Kṛṣṇa, to become a imitation Kṛṣṇa... Just like there are so many persons, they say, "I am Kṛṣṇa." This is māyā. Immediately... Because we trying to forget Kṛṣṇa, our relationship with Kṛṣṇa, immediately māyā captures.
So two things must go on, parallel. Then if we . . . two things must go, then you are promoted to the second platform, ''madhyama-adhikārī. Madhyama-adhikārī'' means at that time he sees four things:


<div class="lec_verse">
:''īśvare tad-adhīneṣu''
kṛṣṇa-bahirmukha hañā bhoga vāñchā kare<br />
:''bāliśeṣu dviṣatsu ca''
nikaṭa-stha māyā tāre jāpaṭiyā dhare<br />
:''prema-maitrī-kṛpopekṣā''
( Prema-vivarta )</div>
:''yaḥ karoti sa madhyamaḥ''
:([[SB 11.2.46|SB 11.2.46]])


''Madhyama. Īśvara.'' By ''arcana-vidhi'', he understands Kṛṣṇa, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, by this process, by the regulative process, by the instruction of the spiritual master, by the regulative principles set up in the ''bhakti-śāstras'', just like ''Nārada Pañcarātra, Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu.'' There are many. So at that time, if one comes from the lower platform to the . . .


As soon as we desire to forget Kṛṣṇa, or to rebel against Kṛṣṇa, that "Why I shall serve Kṛṣṇa? I am Kṛṣṇa," immediately māyā is there, side by side. Kṛṣṇa is there. Apaśyat puruṣaṁ pūrṇaṁ māyāṁ ca tad-apāśrayam. When Vyāsadeva, after getting instruction from Nārada, he wanted to write Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, so he first of all meditated. Bhakti-yogena manasi, apaśyat puruṣaṁ pūrṇaṁ māyāṁ ca tad-apāśrayam [[SB 1.7.4]] . He saw both Kṛṣṇa and His illusory energy, apāśrayam, on the back side.
Of course, we must know that any devotee, either in the lower platform or in the second platform or on the first platform, they are to be considered as devotees. Not that because one is in the material platform, he's not devotee. He is also devotee. But he has to improve.


So Kṛṣṇa is never influenced by the illusory energy, māyā. We become influenced by the māyā. Kṛṣṇa... Just like cloud. Cloud cannot cover the sun. It is our eyes which are covered by the cloud. We see, we say that "Now the sun is covered by the cloud." No, that is not the fact. Sun is very, very big. Sun cannot be covered by cloud. It is our eyes which are covered by the cloud. Similarly, māyā... We are teeny part and parcel of Kṛṣṇa. Therefore we are covered by māyā. Sometimes, not always. Kṛṣṇa, when we forget Kṛṣṇa...
The improvement means he must know what is Kṛṣṇa. Simply if he remains attached to the temple worship and does not try to understand who is a Kṛṣṇa devotee and how he has to deal with others . . . ''na tad-bhakteṣu cānyeṣu.'' We have got some duty to others. This is preaching work. This is preaching work. One should not be satisfied simply by worshiping in the temple. Then he'll remain a neophyte. He must become a preacher, Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Then he comes to the second platform.


<div class="lec_verse">
So when he becomes a preacher he sees four things. He sees God, Kṛṣṇa, Īśvara; ''tad-adhīna'', and the devotees. ''Tad-adhīna'' means those who have accepted Kṛṣṇa as the ''parama-puruṣa.'' There is another verse in the ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavata'': ''itthaṁ brahma-sukhānubhūtyā dāsyaṁ gatānāṁ para-daivatena. Dāsyaṁ gatānām'', for the ''bhaktas'', Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme Lord, Paradeva.
kṛṣṇa-bahirmukha hañā bhoga vāñchā kare<br />
nikaṭa-stha māyā tāre jāpaṭiyā dhare<br />
( Prema-vivarta )</div>


:''itthaṁ brahma-sukhānubhūtyā''
:''dāsyaṁ gatānāṁ para-daivatena''
:''māyāśritānāṁ nara-dārakeṇa''
:''sākaṁ vijahruḥ kṛta-puṇya-puñjāḥ''
:([[SB 10.12.7-11|SB 10.12.11]])


As soon as we try to forget Kṛṣṇa, immediately māyā is there. Therefore the reversing process, reversing process, if we want to go back again to Kṛṣṇa, then daivī hy eṣā guṇamayī mama māyā duratyayā [[BG 7.14]] . You cannot go back to home, back to Godhead, by your own speculation. That is not possible. Ciraṁ vicinvan. You can go on speculating to become one with God. That is another thing. But if you actually want to know God and see God, then as Kṛṣṇa says, mām eva ye prapadyante māyām etāṁ taranti te: [[BG 7.14]] simply surrender to Kṛṣṇa and māyā will give you no more trouble. You can see Kṛṣṇa. This is the process.
When Śukadeva Gosvāmī described the cowherd boys playing with Kṛṣṇa . . . so he is remarking that, "These boys who are playing with Kṛṣṇa . . . who is this Kṛṣṇa?" ''Itthaṁ brahma-sukhānubhūtyā''. Those, those who are impersonalists, those who are attached to the impersonal ''brahma-jyotir'', for them, He is the target. He is the target. From Him, the ''brahma-jyotir'' comes. ''Itthaṁ satāṁ brahma-sukhānubhūtyā''. And ''dāsyaṁ gatānāṁ para-daivatena'': "And those who are devotees, for them, here is the Supreme Lord." ''Dāsyaṁ gatānāṁ para-daivatena''.


Therefore Kṛṣṇa says, mayy āsakta-manāḥ pārtha yogam. To... This is yoga system. It is called bhakti-yoga. Bhakti-yoga system. So a neophyte devotee should be engaged in temple worship, but if he does not make further improvement, if he sticks to the simply temple worship, then he remains a kaniṣṭha-adhikārī, lower-standard devotee. Lower-standard devotee. But one has to become first-standard devotee; at least, one must... A first-standard devotee is very high position, spiritual position. But at least, we must come to the second standard. The lower standard is
And ''māyāśritānāṁ nara-dārakeṇa'': "And those who are under the influence of ''māyā'', for them, He's ordinary human child." The same person, different views. One is seeing that the ultimate target of ''brahma-jyotir'', and somebody is seeing that He is the Supreme Lord, and somebody's seeing, "He's ordinary boy." So Kṛṣṇa is visioned under different position. Under different position. But He's the Supreme Lord.


<div class="lec_verse">
So this yoga system, attachment for Kṛṣṇa, begins from the temple worship and ends into ''mahā-bhāgavata. Mahā-bhāgavata'' means who simply sees Kṛṣṇa, nothing . . . ''sarvatra sphūrati haya iṣṭa-deva. Sthāvara-jaṅgama dekhe nā dekhe tāra mūrti'' ([[CC Madhya 8.274|CC Madhya 8.274]]). Similarly, in the ''Bhagavad-gītā'' also:
arcāyām eva haraye<br />
pūjāṁ yaḥ śraddhayehate<br />
na tad-bhakteṣu cānyeṣu<br />
sa bhaktaḥ prākṛtaḥ smṛtaḥ</div>


:''vidyā-vinaya-sampanne''
:''brāhmaṇe gavi hastini''
:''śuni caiva śva-pāke ca''
:''paṇḍitāḥ sama-darśinaḥ''
:([[BG 5.18 (1972)|BG 5.18]])


Arcā, this arcā-vigraha, Deity, Kṛṣṇa, arcāyām eva haraye, the Deity of Kṛṣṇa, yaḥ pūjāṁ śraddhayā īhate, with great devotion and according to the rules and regulations, if one performs, that is very nice. But if he does not improve, na tad-bhakteṣu cānyeṣu, he does not become knowable to the devotees and other persons, then he remains a kaniṣṭha-adhikārī. Sa bhaktaḥ prākṛtaḥ. Prākṛta means in the material platform. He does not actually promoted to the spiritual platform if he simply remains. Therefore along with the worship of Kṛṣṇa in the temple, this hearing should be... Śravaṇaṁ kīrtanam [[SB 7.5.23]] . Just like we are doing. We do not engage only the devotees to the temple worship, but there must be program for hearing Bhagavad-gītā, Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, the science of God. Otherwise, after sometimes, simply if you ring the bell, after time you'll be disgusted and the whole thing will be lost. As it has become now in India. There was no instruction about Kṛṣṇa consciousness. They simply attached to the temple and belling. And now it is now zero. Devotion is zero.
He does not see anything but Kṛṣṇa. A ''mahā-bhāgavata'', when a tree . . . when he sees a tree, he does not see the form of the tree, but he sees Kṛṣṇa. That is ''mahā-bhāgavata.'' That we should not imitate. That is the highest stage, perfectional stage. But at least we come to the middle stage. What is that middle stage? To . . .


So two things must go on, parallel. Then if we, two things must go, then you are promoted to the second platform, madhyama-adhikārī. Madhyama-adhikārī means at that time he sees four things:
We must understand what is God, what is Kṛṣṇa. Perfect understanding. And ''tad-adhīna,'' and His devotees. ''Īśvare tad-adhīneṣu bāliśa. Bāliśa'' means innocent person. They are un . . . I mean to . . . they do not know actually what is God. And ''dviṣat. Dviṣat'' means envious. The four classes of men: God, His devotee, innocent person and envious person, demons.


<div class="lec_verse">
So the person who is promoted to the second stage, he'll deal with these four classes of division differently. ''Īśvara-prema''. One should try to learn how to love Kṛṣṇa. ''Yato bhaktir adhokṣaje'' ([[SB 1.2.6|SB 1.2.6]]). That is first class. And tad . . . ''īśvare tad-adhīneṣu bāliśeṣu dviṣatsu ca, prema, prema'', love for Kṛṣṇa, and ''maitrī'', and to make friendship with the devotees. ''Prema-maitrī''. And ''kṛpā'': those who are innocent, one should be merciful. The devotee should be merciful, just to awaken their Kṛṣṇa consciousness.
īśvare tad-adhīneṣu<br />
bāliśeṣu dviṣatsu ca<br />
prema-maitrī-kṛpopekṣā<br />
yaḥ karoti sa madhyamaḥ</div>


And ''dviṣatsu ca upekṣāḥ'': and those who are envious, they should be rejected. These four classes . . . to try to love Kṛṣṇa, to make friendship with devotees, and to give some service to the innocent public who does not know what is God, and those who are envious, ''asuras'', they should be rejected. The ''madhyama-adhikārī'' should not touch the demons, because maybe he may turn again, be demon. Therefore one should be very careful to associate with the demons.


Madhyama. Īśvara. By arcana-vidhi, he understands Kṛṣṇa, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, by this process. By the regulative process, by the instruction of the spiritual master, by the regulative principles set up in the bhakti-śāstras, just like Nārada-pañcarātra, Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu. There are many. So at that time, if one comes from the lower platform to the... Of course, we must know that any devotee, either in the lower platform or in the second platform or on the firs platform, they are to be considered as devotees. Not that because one is in the material platform, he's not devotee. He is also devotee. But he has to improve. The improvement means he must know what is Kṛṣṇa. Simply if he remains attached to the temple worship and does not try to understand who is a Kṛṣṇa devotee and how he has to deal with others... Na tad-bhakteṣu cānyeṣu. We have got some duty to others. This is preaching work. This is preaching work. One should not be satisfied simply by worshiping in the temple. Then he'll remain a neophyte. He must become a preacher, Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Then he comes to the second platform.
But when one becomes ''uttama-adhikārī, mahā-bhāgavata'', he does not see anyone as demon. He sees, "Everyone is worshiping Kṛṣṇa. I am not worshiping." This is ''mahā-bhāgavata''. Just like Rādhārāṇī. Rādhārāṇī always feels that "I do not know how to love Kṛṣṇa. Oh, he . . . here is a gopī. How she loves Kṛṣṇa." That is Her . . . this is called ''mahā-bhāva.''


So when he becomes a preacher he sees four things. He sees God, Kṛṣṇa, Īśvara; tad-adhīna, and the devotees. Tad-adhīna means those who have accepted Kṛṣṇa as the parama-puruṣa. There is another verse in the Śrīmad-Bhāgavata: itthaṁ satāṁ brahma-sukhānubhūtyā dāsyaṁ gatānāṁ para-daivatena. Dāsyaṁ gatānām, for the bhaktas, Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme Lord, Paradeva.
So we should not imitate Rādhārāṇī. Caitanya Mahāprabhu . . . just like Caitanya Mahāprabhu, He's the symbol of Rādhārāṇī's ''mahā-bhāva.'' He says that "I do not love Kṛṣṇa. I do not know how to love Kṛṣṇa." Then if you . . . somebody, if somebody says: "Then why You are crying?" "Well, that is a show. I am making a show. I am crying." Then what is the symptom? "The symptom is that if I would have loved Kṛṣṇa, then without Him I have died long, long ago. I should have died. I am living still without Kṛṣṇa, that means I do not love Kṛṣṇa." This is ''mahā-bhāgavata-bhāva'', separation.


<div class="lec_verse">
:''āśliṣya vā pāda-ratāṁ pinaṣṭu mām''
itthaṁ satāṁ brahma-sukhānubhūtyā<br />
:''marma-hatāṁ karotu vā adarśanān''
dāsyaṁ gatānāṁ para-daivatena<br />
:''yathā tathā vā vidadhātu lampaṭo''
māyāśritānāṁ nara-dārakeṇa<br />
:''mat-prāṇa-nāthas tu sa eva nāparaḥ''
sākaṁ vijahruḥ kṛta-puṇya-puñjāḥ<br />
:([[CC Antya 20.47|CC Antya 20.47]])
[[SB 10.12.11]] </div>


This is ''mahā-bhāgavata.'' So ''mahā-bhāgavata'', we should not imitate. But we should not remain also as ''kaniṣṭha-adhikārī''. We must come to the ''madhyama-adhikārī,'' middle stage. So these stages will be manifest gradually if we simply try to develop our attachment for Kṛṣṇa.


When Śukadeva Gosvāmī described the cowherd boys playing with Kṛṣṇa... So he is remarking that "These boys who are playing with Kṛṣṇa... Who is this Kṛṣṇa?" Itthaṁ satāṁ brahma-sukhānubhūtyā. Those, those who are impersonalists, those who are attached to the impersonal brahmajyoti, for them, He is the target. He is the target. From Him, the brahmajyoti comes. Itthaṁ satāṁ brahma-sukhānubhūtyā. And dāsyaṁ gatānāṁ para-daivatena: "And those who are devotees, for them, here is the Supreme Lord." Dāsyaṁ gatānāṁ para-daivatena. And māyāśritānāṁ nara-dārakeṇa: "And those who are under the influence of māyā, for them, He's ordinary human child." The same person. Different views. One is seeing that the ultimate target of brahmajyoti, and somebody is seeing that He is the Supreme Lord, and somebody's seeing, "He's ordinary boy." So Kṛṣṇa is visioned under different positions. Under different positions. But He's the Supreme Lord.
So this is the beginning: ''arcā, arcanam. Śravaṇaṁ kīrtanaṁ viṣṇoḥ smaraṇaṁ pāda-sevanam arcanam'' ([[SB 7.5.23-24|SB 7.5.23]]). ''Arcanam''. Therefore for every ''gṛhastha'' . . . because ''gṛhasthas'' are busy in so many ways, they have no opportunity to preach. But they must take to ''arcana''. Every house, every householder, they must . . . what is the difficulty?


So this yoga system, attachment for Kṛṣṇa, begins from the temple worship and ends into mahā-bhāgavata. Mahā-bhāgavata means who simply sees Kṛṣṇa, nothing... Sarvatra haya nija iṣṭa-deva-sphūrti. Sthāvara-jaṅgama dekhe nā dekhe tāra mūrti [[CC Madhya 8.274]] . Similarly, in the Bhagavad-gītā also:
Just like we have got in this platform, Deity of Rādhā-Kṛṣṇa, everyone can install Rādhā-Kṛṣṇa Deity at home and under the instruction of spiritual master and śāstric regulations. Then if we engage ourselves in ''arcana-vidhi'', then automatically, all the anomalies of life will stop. ''Ādau śraddhā tataḥ sādhu-saṅgo 'tha bhajana-kriyā'' ([[CC Madhya 23.14-15]]). This ''arcana-vidhi'' is one of the items of ''bhajana, bhajana-kriyā.''


<div class="lec_verse">
So ''anartha-nivṛttiḥ syāt.'' If every house engages in this ''arcana-vidhi'', so many unwanted things will vanish. You'll have no more interest for seeing cinema or going to the restaurant or smoking ''biḍi'' and wasting time by unnecessary talks. So many things. Then your life will be perfect. So many nonsense things will go automatically. ''Anartha-nivṛttiḥ syāt''. So therefore to become Kṛṣṇa conscious, every house, everywhere, every person, every human being should adopt this ''arcana-vidhi''. Then at least he will save so many unnecessary . . . ''anartha-nivṛttiḥ syāt. Ādau śraddhā tataḥ sādhu-saṅgaḥ'' ([[CC Madhya 23.14-15]]).
vidyā-vinaya-sampanne<br />
brāhmaṇe gavi hastini<br />
śuni caiva śva-pāke ca<br />
paṇḍitāḥ sama-darśinaḥ<br />
[[BG 5.18]] </div>


So Kṛṣṇa says that ''mayy āsakta-manāḥ pārtha'': "My dear Arjuna . . ." Arjuna is addressed here as "Pārtha," very familial. Because Pārtha, Kṛṣṇa . . . Arjuna's mother's name was Pṛthā, Kuntī's name. So . . . and Pṛthā, Kuntī, happened to be the aunt of Kṛṣṇa. So He's very feelingly, in a familial way, He's addressing, "Pārtha." "My dear Arjuna, Pārtha," ''mayy āsakta-manāḥ'', "simply by increasing attachment for Me," ''mayy āsakta, mayy āsakta-manāḥ pārtha yogam'' . . . this is ''yoga''. This is perfect ''yoga. Yoginām api sarve . . . mad-āśrayaḥ.'' "This ''yoga'' system should be executed directly under My direction, or under the direction of a representative of Mine."


He does not see anything but Kṛṣṇa. A mahā-bhāgavata, when a tree, when he sees a tree, he does not see the form of the tree, but he sees Kṛṣṇa. That is mahā-bhāgavata. That we should not imitate. That is the highest stage, perfectional stage. But at least, we come to the middle stage. What is that middle stage? To... We must understand what is God, what is Kṛṣṇa. Perfect understanding. And tad-adhīna, and His devotees. Īśvare tad-adhīneṣu bāliśa. Bāliśa means innocent persons. They are un... I mean to... They do not know actually what is God. And dviṣat. Dviṣat means envious. The four classes of men: God, His devotee, innocent person, and envious person, demons. So the person who is promoted to the second stage, he'll deal with these four classes of divisions differently. Īśvara-prema. One should try to learn how to love Kṛṣṇa. Yato bhaktir adhokṣaje [[SB 1.2.6]] . That is first class. And tad, īśvare tad-adhīneṣu bāliśeṣu dviṣatsu ca, prema, prema, love for Kṛṣṇa, and maitrī, and to make friendship with the devotees. Prema-maitrī. And kṛpā: those who are innocent, one should be merciful. The devotee should be merciful, just to awaken their Kṛṣṇa consciousness. And dviṣatsu ca upekṣāḥ: and those who are envious, they should be rejected. These four classes... To try to love Kṛṣṇa, to make friendship with devotees, and to give some service to the innocent public who does not know what is God, and those who are envious, asuras, they should be rejected. The madhyama-adhikārī should not touch the demons. Because maybe, he may turn again, be demon. Therefore one should be very careful to associate with the demons.
The spiritual master is the representative of Kṛṣṇa. How he becomes representative? What is the test? The test is . . . just like anyone can understand, representative. Suppose a business firm's representative is going to canvass for business, what is his business? He will take the interest of the firm, not his personal interest. He will try to secure business for the firm he's working, not for his personal . . . that is perfect representative. And if he goes, in the name of the firm's representative, and he does his own business, then he's a liar.


But when one becomes uttama-adhikārī, mahā-bhāgavata, he does not see anyone as demon. He sees, "Everyone is worshiping Kṛṣṇa. I am not worshiping." This is mahā-bhāgavata. Just like Rādhārāṇī. Rādhārāṇī always feels that "I do not know how to love Kṛṣṇa. Oh, he, here is a gopī. How she loves Kṛṣṇa." That is Her... This is called mahā-bhāva. So we should not imitate Rādhārāṇī. Caitanya Mahāprabhu... Just like Caitanya Mahāprabhu, He's the symbol of Rādhārāṇī's mahā-bhāva. He says that "I do not love Kṛṣṇa. I do not know how to love Kṛṣṇa." Then if you, somebody, if somebody says, "Then why You are crying?" "Well, that is a show. I am making a show. I am crying." Then what is the symptom? "The symptom is that if I would have loved Kṛṣṇa, then without Him I have died long, long ago. I should have died. I am living still without Kṛṣṇa; that means I do not love Kṛṣṇa." This is mahā-bhāgavata-bhāva, separation.
Similarly, Kṛṣṇa's representative means one who speaks about Kṛṣṇa as Kṛṣṇa speaks. And if he adulterates, he's a liar; he's not representative. He's not representative. Kṛṣṇa says, ''man-manā bhava mad-bhakto mad-yājī māṁ namaskuru'' ([[BG 18.65 (1972)|BG 18.65]]), and if the representative says: "Just become a devotee of Kṛṣṇa. Just worship Kṛṣṇa. Just offer your obeisances to Kṛṣṇa," he is representative.


<div class="lec_verse">
Kṛṣṇa says, ''sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja'' ([[BG 18.66 (1972)|BG 18.66]]), and the representative will say that, "You give up all other process. You simply surrender to Kṛṣṇa." He will never say that, "I am Kṛṣṇa." He'll never say. He's not representative of Kṛṣṇa. He's a liar. He's not representative.
āśliṣya vā pāda-ratāṁ pinaṣṭu mām<br />
adarśanān marma-hatāṁ karotu vā<br />
yathā tathā vā vidadhātu lampaṭo<br />
mat-prāṇa-nāthas tu sa eva nāparaḥ<br />
[[CC Antya 20.47]] </div>


So to become representative of Kṛṣṇa is not very difficult. Simply one has to become very sincere. That's all. That whatever Kṛṣṇa says, he will say. Just like Arjuna accepted: ''sarvam etad ṛtaṁ manye yad vadasi keśava'' ([[BG 10.14 (1972)|BG 10.14]]). That is representative. "My dear Keśava, Kṛṣṇa, whatever You are speaking, I accept them all, in ''toto'', without any reformation." That is representative of Kṛṣṇa. Caitanya Mahāprabhu said:


[Lord Kṛṣṇa, who is the lover of many devotees (women), may embrace this fully surrendered maidservant or may trample me with His feet, or He may render me brokenhearted by not being present before me for a long duration of time, but still He is nothing less than the Absolute Lord of my heart].
:''āmāra ājñāya guru hañā tāra' ei deśa''
:''yāre dekha tāre kaha 'kṛṣṇa'-upadeśa''
:([[CC Madhya 7.128|CC Madhya 7.128]])


This is mahā-bhāgavata. So mahā-bhāgavata, we should not imitate. But we should not remain also as kaniṣṭha-adhikārī. We must come to the madhyama-adhikārī, middle stage. So these stages will be manifest gradually if we simply try to develop our attachment for Kṛṣṇa.
''Āmāra ājñāya''. One has to carry out the order of God. He is representative. Otherwise liar, misnomer. So therefore Kṛṣṇa says, ''mad-āśrayaḥ. Mad-āśrayaḥ'': "Either under My direction, the direction is there, or My representative's." ''Mat. Mad-āśrayaḥ'' means "either under My direction or one who has taken . . ."


So this is the beginning: arcā, arcanam. Śravaṇaṁ kīrtanaṁ viṣṇoḥ smaraṇaṁ pāda-sevanam arcanam [[SB 7.5.23]] . Arcanam. Therefore for every gṛhastha... Because gṛhasthas are busy in so many ways, they have no opportunity to preach. But they must take to arcana. Every house, every householder, they must... What is the difficulty? Just like we have got in this platform, Deity of Rādhā-Kṛṣṇa, everyone can install Rādhā-Kṛṣṇa Deity at home and under the instruction of spiritual master and shastric regulations. Then, if we engage ourselves in arcana-vidhi, then automatically, all the anomalies of life will stop. Ādau śraddhā tataḥ sādhu-saṅgo 'tha bhajana-kriyā [[SB 7.5.23]] . This arcana-vidhi is one of the items of bhajana, bhajana-kriyā. So anartha-nivṛttiḥ syāt. If every house engages in this arcana-vidhi, so many unwanted things will vanish. You'll have no more interest for seeing cinema or going to the restaurant or smoking biḍi and wasting time by unnecessary talks. So many things. And your life will be perfect. So many nonsense things will go automatically. Anartha-nivṛttiḥ syāt. So therefore to become Kṛṣṇa conscious, every house, everywhere, every person, every human being should adopt this arcana-vidhi. Then at least he will save so many unnecessary... Anartha-nivṛttiḥ syāt. Ādau śraddhā tataḥ sādhu-saṅgaḥ [[SB 7.5.23]] .  
(break) . . . we have discussed. But ''gāyatrī-mantra'' is the beginning of brahminical culture because without attaining the brahminical qualification, nobody can understand Vedic literature. Therefore a ''brāhmin'', initiated, he's given the ''gāyatrī-mantra''. So that is required. (break)


So Kṛṣṇa says that mayy āsakta-manāḥ pārtha: "My dear Arjuna..." Arjuna is addressed here as "Pārtha," very familial. Because Pārtha, Kṛṣṇa, Arjuna's mother's name was Pṛthā, Kuntī's name. And Pṛthā, Kuntī, happened to be the aunt of Kṛṣṇa. So He's very feelingly, in a familial way, He's addressing, "Pārtha, My dear Arjuna, Pārtha, mayy āsakta-manāḥ, simply by increasing attachment for Me," mayy āsakta, mayy āsakta-manāḥ pārtha yogam... This is yoga. This is perfect yoga. Yoginām api sarve... Mad-āśrayaḥ. "This yoga system should be executed directly under My direction, or under the direction of a representative of Mine." The spiritual master is the representative of Kṛṣṇa. How he becomes representative? What is the test? The test is... Just like anyone can understand, representative. Suppose a business firm's representative is going to canvass for business, what is his business? He will take the interest of the firm, not his personal interest. He will try to secure business for the firm he's working, not for his personal... That is perfect representative. And if he goes, in the name of the firm's representative, and he does his own business, then he's a liar. Similarly, Kṛṣṇa's representative means one who speaks about Kṛṣṇa as Kṛṣṇa speaks. And if he adulterates, he's a liar. He's not representative. He's not representative. Kṛṣṇa says, man-manā bhava mad-bhakto mad-yājī māṁ namaskuru [[BG 18.65]] , and if the representative says, "Just become a devotee of Kṛṣṇa. Just worship Kṛṣṇa. Just offer your obeisances to Kṛṣṇa," he is representative. Kṛṣṇa says, sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja [[BG 18.65]] , and the representative will say that "You give up all other process. You simply surrender to Kṛṣṇa." He will never say that "I am Kṛṣṇa." He'll never say. He's not representative of Kṛṣṇa. He's a liar. He's not representative.
Indian man: Hare Kṛṣṇa. Your Divine Grace, in order to understand Śrī Bhagavān Kṛṣṇa, we have to take your help, as you said you can explain what are the words of Lord Kṛṣṇa. And in order to understand yourself we have, or we had to take the help of so many other persons.


So to become representative of Kṛṣṇa is not very difficult. Simply one has to become very sincere. That's all. That whatever Kṛṣṇa says, he will say. Just like Arjuna accepted: sarvam etad ṛtaṁ manye yad vadasi keśava [[BG 10.14]] . That is representative. "My dear Keśava, Kṛṣṇa, whatever You are speaking, I accept them all, in toto, without any reformation." That is representative of Kṛṣṇa. Caitanya Mahāprabhu said,
You speak in English and Sanskrit or Hindi, and at college and at school, so many teachers taught us Sanskrit, Hindi, and history, geography—because there are so many illustrations in your speech also. Then ''guru'' has been defined like this:


<div class="lec_verse">
:''ajñāna-timirāndhasya''
yāre dekha tāre kaha 'kṛṣṇa'-upadeśa<br />
:''jñānāñjana-śalākayā''
āmāra ājñāya guru hañā tāra' ei deśa<br />
:''cakṣur unmīlitaṁ yena''
[[CC Madhya 7.128]] </div>
:''tasmai śrī-gurave namaḥ''
:(''Garuḍa Purāṇa'')


''Ajñāna timirāndhasya''. About ''jñāna'', nothing has been said whether it is spiritual ''jñāna'' or material ''jñāna''. So in order to understanding you and, through yourself, also Kṛṣṇa, all these so-called ''gurus'', or, I may say, teachers, they have contributed towards understanding or developing Kṛṣṇa consciousness.


Āmāra ājñāya. One has to carry out the order of God. He is representative. Otherwise liar, misnomer. So therefore Kṛṣṇa says, mad-āśrayaḥ. Mad-āśrayaḥ: "Either under My direction, the direction is there, or My representative's." Mat. Mad-āśrayaḥ means "either under My direction or one who has taken..." [break]
Now, leaving aside these material teachers, I am taking the, taking one spiritual ''guru'' who gave me Kṛṣṇa consciousness first and who taught me to worship God, Kṛṣṇa, and to maintain a temple at my own house and to learn the ''ślokas'' from ''Gītā'' or the ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavata.'' And I have learned by rote the grandness of ''adhyāyas'' of ''Bhāgavatam'' and the ''Gītā''. But, you see, I could not understand anything.


...We have discussed. But gāyatrī-mantra is the beginning of brahminical culture because without attaining the brahminical qualification, nobody can understand Vedic literature. Therefore a brāhmaṇa, initiated, he's given the gāyatrī-mantra. So that is required. [break]
Now, after going through your literature, complete literatures, now the whole light has come to me, and I have been able to understand even that the ''guru'' who gave me such Kṛṣṇa consciousness. I don't challenge or question the other findings of their ''guru''. Just like a boy who absent from class, not attending the class, there is no fault of the ''guru. Guru'' has been attending his lectures. But I am truant. I am not attending class. So, you see, I can't blame that ''guru''. But now I have understood everything from Your Grace, and now that ''ajñāna'' has been removed. I have now become more Kṛṣṇa conscious than before.


Indian: Hare Kṛṣṇa. Your Divine Grace, in order to understand Śrī Bhagavān Kṛṣṇa, we have to take your help, as you said you have explained what are the words of Kṛṣṇa. And in order to understand yourself we have, or we had to take the help of so many other persons. You speak in English and Sanskrit or Hindi, and at college, and at school, so many teachers taught us Sanskrit, Hindi, and history, geography, because there are so many illustrations in your speech also. Then guru has been defined like this:
So should I give credit to all those ''gurus'' who have helped me to understand? Or should I now select, or should I exercise any choice that I should accept this ''guru'' or that ''guru'' only? So that doubt should be cleared.


<div class="lec_verse">
Prabhupāda: Hmm. ''Guru'' is only one. ''Guru'' means, as you explained:
ajñāna-timirāndhasya<br />
jñānāñjana-śalākayā<br />
cakṣur unmīlitaṁ yena<br />
tasmai śrī-gurave namaḥ</div>


:''ajñāna-timirāndhasya''
:''jñānāñjana-śalākayā''
:''cakṣur unmīlitaṁ yena''
:''tasmai śrī-gurave namaḥ''
:(''Garuḍa Purāṇa'')


Ajñāna timirāndhasya. About jñāna, nothing has been said whether it is spiritual jñāna or material jñāna. So in order to understanding you and, through yourself, also Kṛṣṇa, all these so-called gurus, or, I may say, teachers, they have contributed towards understanding or developing Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Now, leaving aside these material teachers I am taking the, taking one spiritual guru who gave me Kṛṣṇa consciousness first and who taught me to worship God, Kṛṣṇa, and to maintain a temple at my own house and to learn the ślokas from Gītā or the Śrīmad-Bhāgavata. And I have learned by rote the grandness of adhyāyas of Bhāgavatam and the Gītā. But you see I could not understand anything. Now, after going through your literatures, complete literatures, now the whole light has come to me, and I have began to understand even that the guru who gave me such Kṛṣṇa consciousness. I don't challenge or question the other findings of their(?) gurus. Just like a boy who absent from class, not attending his class, there is no fault of the guru. Guru has been attending his lectures. But I am truant. I am not attending class. So you see I can't blame that guru. But now I have understood everything from Your Grace, and now that ajñāna has been removed. I have now become more Kṛṣṇa conscious than before. So should I give credit to all those gurus who have helped me to understand? Or should I now select, or should I exercise any choice that I should accept this guru or that guru only? So that doubt should be cleared.
One who eradicates the ''ajñāna, andhakāra'', darkness. In the darkness, if somebody brings lamp, ''ajñāna-timirāndhasya jñānāñjana-śalākayā'' . . . the ''jñāna-rūpa'', torchlight, he's ''guru''. So maybe different degrees, but anyone who opens the spiritual eyes, he's ''guru''. So . . .


Prabhupāda: Hmmm. Guru is only one. Guru means, as you explained,
But in the ''śāstra'' it is said, ''gurur api kāryākāryakam ajānataḥ.'' If I accept some ''guru'', but if later on it appears that he did not know what is to be done, what is to be not to be done, then Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī says that such ''guru'': ''parityāgo vidhīyate''. Such ''guru'' should be rejected. But it doesn't matter that degree. Actually, if the ''guru'' teaches Kṛṣṇa consciousness, then he may be in lesser degree, but he's accepted as ''guru''. There is no question of rejection.


<div class="lec_verse">
Because Kṛṣṇa is actually ''jñāna''. One who teaches Kṛṣṇa as the Supreme Personality of Godhead, "One has to know Kṛṣṇa, one has to surrender to Kṛṣṇa," this kind of teaching is required. And if the ''guru'' says that, "I am Kṛṣṇa. Everyone is Kṛṣṇa," then, "''daridra-kṛṣṇa, daridra-nārāyaṇa''," he is not a ''guru''. He's not a ''guru''. He's misguiding. Misguiding. ''Avaiṣṇavo gurur na syāt''. This is the śāstric injunction.
ajñāna-timirāndhasya<br />
jñānāñjana-śalākayā<br />
cakṣur unmīlitaṁ yena<br />
tasmai śrī-gurave namaḥ</div>


''Ṣaṭ-karma-nipuṇo vipro mantra-tantra-viśāradaḥ.'' A . . . generally, a qualified ''brāhmin'' becomes ''guru''. That is natural. ''brāhmin'' is the head of the society. So he is . . . and without becoming ''brāhmin'', nobody can become ''guru''. That is also fact. Because ''brāhmin'' means ''brahma jānātīti brāhmanaḥ'', one who knows Brahman, Brahman. So ''guru'' must be a ''brāhmin'', mean a qualified ''brāhmin'', not born-''brāhmin'', so-called ''brāhmin''. Qualified ''brāhmin''.


One who eradicates the ajñāna, andhakāra, darkness. In the darkness, if somebody brings lamp, ajñāna-timirāndhasya jñānāñjana-śalākayā... The jñāna-rūpa, torchlight, he's guru. So maybe of different degrees, but anyone who opens the spiritual eyes, he's guru. So... But in the śāstra it is said, gurur api kāryākāryakam ajānataḥ. If I accept some guru, but if later on it appears that he did not know what is to be done, what is to be not to be done, then Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī says that such guru: parityāgo vidhīyate. Such guru should be rejected. But it doesn't matter that degree. Actually, if the guru teaches Kṛṣṇa consciousness, then he may be in lesser degree, but he's accepted as guru. There is no question of rejection. Because Kṛṣṇa is actually jñāna. One who teaches Kṛṣṇa as the Supreme Personality of Godhead, "One has to know Kṛṣṇa, one has to surrender to Kṛṣṇa," this kind of teaching is required. And if the guru says that "I am Kṛṣṇa. Everyone is Kṛṣṇa," then, " daridra-kṛṣṇa, daridra-nārāyaṇa, " he is not a guru. He's not a guru. He's misguiding. Misguiding. Avaiṣṇavo gurur na syāt. This is the shastric injunction. Ṣaṭ-karma-nipuṇo vipro mantra-tantra-viśāradaḥ. A... Generally, a qualified brāhmaṇa becomes guru. That is natural. Brāhmaṇa is the head of the society. So he is... And without becoming brāhmaṇa, nobody can become guru. That is also fact. Because brāhmaṇa means brahma jānātīti brāhmaṇaḥ, one who knows Brahman, Brahman. So guru must be a brāhmaṇa, mean a qualified brāhmaṇa, not born- brāhmaṇa, so-called brāhmaṇa. Qualified brāhmaṇa. So still, brāhmaṇa's qualification, ṣaṭ-karma, paṭhana pāṭhana yajana yājana dāna pratigraha. So śāstra says that ṣaṭ-karma-nipuṇo vipraḥ. If one vipra is quite expert in executing the six kinds of business, and mantra-tantra-viśāradaḥ, and very well known in the Vedic mantras and hymns and everything complete, but if he is avaiṣṇava, if he is not Vaiṣṇava, he does not know viṣṇu-tattva, or kṛṣṇa-tattva, then he cannot become spiritual master. Avaiṣṇavo gurur na syād vaiṣṇavaḥ śva-paco guruḥ. But if a Vaiṣṇava, one who knows viṣṇu-tattva, kṛṣṇa-tattva, even if he's born in the family of śva-paca, the dog-eaters, caṇḍāla, he can be accepted as guru. So the real test is whether the guru is a Vaiṣṇava, whether he know the science of Kṛṣṇa. That is also confirmed by Caitanya Mahāprabhu:
So still, ''brāhmin'''s qualification, ''ṣaṭ-karma'': ''paṭhana pāṭhana yajana yājana dāna pratigraha''. So ''śāstra'' says that ''ṣaṭ-karma-nipuṇo vipraḥ''. If one ''vipra'' is quite expert in executing the six kinds of business, and ''mantra-tantra-viśāradaḥ'', and very well known in the Vedic ''mantras'' and hymns and everything complete, but if he is ''avaiṣṇava'', if he is not Vaiṣṇava, he does not know ''viṣṇu-tattva'', or ''kṛṣṇa-tattva'', then he cannot become spiritual master.


<div class="lec_verse">
''Avaiṣṇavo gurur na syād vaiṣṇavaḥ śva-paco guruḥ.'' But if a Vaiṣṇava, one who knows ''viṣṇu-tattva, kṛṣṇa-tattva'', even if he's born in the family of ''śva-paca'', the dog-eaters, ''caṇḍāla'', he can be accepted as ''guru''.
kibā vipra, kibā nyāsī, śūdra kene naya<br />
yei kṛṣṇa-tattva-vettā sei 'guru' haya<br />
[[CC Madhya 8.128]] </div>


So the real test is whether the ''guru'' is a Vaiṣṇava, whether he knows the science of Kṛṣṇa. That is also confirmed by Caitanya Mahāprabhu:


A... It doesn't matter what he is, whether he's a sannyāsī or a gṛhastha or a brāhmaṇa or a su..., born in brāhmaṇa family or... It doesn't matter. Yei kṛṣṇa-tattva. Anyone who knows Kṛṣṇa, he can become guru, not others. So that is the statement of the śāstras. Avaiṣṇava cannot become guru.
:''kibā vipra, kibā śūdra, nyāsī kene naya''
:''yei kṛṣṇa-tattva-vettā sei 'guru' haya''
:([[CC Madhya 8.128|CC Madhya 8.128]])


Indian: In your presence I may declare also attending I have found your system of Kṛṣṇa consciousness the best and very practical. Because I, I am a...
A . . . it doesn't matter what he is, whether he's a ''sannyāsī'' or a ''gṛhastha'' or a ''brāhmin'' or a ''su'' . . . born in ''brāhmin'' family or . . . it doesn't matter. ''Yei kṛṣṇa-tattva.'' Anyone who knows Kṛṣṇa, he can become ''guru'', not others. So that is the statement of the ''śāstras''. ''Avaiṣṇava'' cannot become ''guru''.


Prabhupāda: Hare Kṛṣṇa. (end)
Indian man: In your presence I may declare also attending I have found your system of Kṛṣṇa consciousness the best and very practical. Because I, I am a . . .


{{BGL_Footer|{{PAGENAME}}}}
Prabhupāda: Hare Kṛṣṇa. (break) (end)

Revision as of 03:45, 2 June 2023

His Divine Grace
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada



721213BG-AHMEDABAD - December 13, 1972 - 54:27 Minutes



Prabhupāda:

mayy āsakta-manāḥ pārtha
yogaṁ yuñjan mad-āśrayaḥ
asaṁśayam samagraṁ māṁ
yathā jñāsyasi tac chṛṇu
(BG 7.1)

So by the end of the Sixth Chapter, Kṛṣṇa has explained the aṣṭa, aṣṭāṅga-yoga-siddhi. Aṣṭāṅga-yoga-siddhi, that yoginām api sarveṣāṁ mad-gatenāntar-ātmanā (BG 6.47): always who is thinking of Kṛṣṇa within himself, śraddhāvān, with faith and knowledge, he is first-class yogī.

So how this first-class yoga system helps me? Because the other yoga system, they will disagree that, "Simply by thinking of Kṛṣṇa within one's heart, how one becomes perfect?" That is explained from the Seventh Chapter of Bhagavad-gītā, how simply by understanding Kṛṣṇa you become well aware of everything, this yoga system. In the Vedas also it is stated, yasmin vijñāte sarvam idaṁ vijñātaṁ bhavati (Muṇḍaka Upaniṣad 1.3). If you, if you simply understand Kṛṣṇa, then you know everything.

Kṛṣṇa is the root of everything. Therefore Kṛṣṇa says, śrī-bhagavān uvāca. We should always remember that this Bhagavad-gītā is being spoken by the Supreme Personality of Godhead. So no more better authority. And God is speaking about Himself. Otherwise, by speculation you cannot understand God. That is not possible. You have to hear from God Himself about God.

athāpi te deva padāmbuja-dvaya-
prasāda-leśānugṛhīta eva hi
jānāti tattvaṁ bhagavan . . .
na cānya eko 'pi ciraṁ vicinvan
(SB 10.14.29)

"A person who has got little favor," athāpi te deva padāmbu . . . "little favor from the lotus feet of Your Lordship, he," jānāti tattvam, "he knows what is tattva, what is the Absolute Truth." Athāpi te deva padāmbuja-dvaya-prasāda-leśānu . . . prasāda-leśa: little favor, not all. Prasāda-leśānugṛhīta eva hi jānāti tattvam, na ca anya ciraṁ vicinvan. Others may go on speculating for years and years, it is not possible to understand.

So similarly, in the Brahmā-saṁhitā, another Vedic literature, it is said, panthās tu koṭi-śata-vatsara-sampragamyo vāyor athāpi manaso muni-puṅgavānām (Bs. 5.34). Muni-puṅgavānām, great saintly persons, sages, if they travel for millions of years . . . panthās tu koṭi-śata-vatsara. Koṭi, again multiplied by hundreds and hundreds. Vāyor athāpi: on the airplane of air.

Not this metal airplane, but actually air airplane or by the airplane of mind. Mind speed we know. Mind can run within a second many thousands of miles, immediately. Suppose I am sitting here. So I have got my apartment in Los Angeles, ten thousand miles away. I can immediately go . . . this is called mind-speed.

So with the mind speed, with the velocity of air, if one runs on, to find out the Kṛṣṇa planet, or Kṛṣṇa, still, avicintya-tattva, still, it is inconceivable tattva.

panthās tu koṭi-śata-vatsara-sampragamyo
vāyor athāpi manaso muni-puṅgavānām
so 'py asti yat-prapada-sīmny avicintya-tattve
govindam ādi-puruṣaṁ tam ahaṁ bhajāmi
(Bs. 5.34)

Govinda is very, very difficult to understand by mental speculation, philosophical theses. Philosophical theses, speculation, without religion is simply waste of time. And religion without philosophical basis is sentiment. They must be combined together.

So Bhagavad-gītā is that: religion combined with philosophy. If you simply take philosophy, it is dry speculation, no juice. Carvita-carvaṇānām: "Chewing the chewed." There is no benefit. And if you take . . . simply take religion without basis of philosophy, then it is fanaticism. That's all. So both should be combined. Religion based on philosophy and logic, that is religion. So that combination is Bhagavad-gītā.

So here in the Seventh Chapter, beginning, opening chapter, it is said, bhagavān uvāca. You are searching after God. Now here is God Himself speaking. So recognized God by all sages: Vyāsadeva, Nārada, Asita, and later on by Rāmānujācārya, by Śaṅkarācārya, by Madhvācārya, by Viṣṇu Svāmī, by Caitanya Mahāprabhu, and then our Guru Mahārāja.

So our method is very simple, evaṁ paramparā-prāptam imaṁ rājarṣayo viduḥ (BG 4.2). So we accept this paramparā system. I may not know what is God, but because my predecessors, ācāryas, confirm it, the "Here is Bhagavān," we accept it. That's all. We save so much trouble by mental speculation. We accept the paramparā system, therefore. And we get the result. So that is the way.

Now here, not only the paramparā system . . . the paramparā system begins from Kṛṣṇa. As Kṛṣṇa says in the Fourth Chapter, imaṁ vivasvate yogaṁ proktavān aham avyayam (BG 4.1): "I spoke first to the sun god." It is not said: "First." Many times He has said to many predominating deities. But in this era . . . this is called the age of Vaivasvata Manu. There are fourteen Manus in one day of Brahmā. So Vaivasvata Manu is the eighth Manu.

That means we are passing through the midday of this era, manvantara. There is fourteen Manus in one day of Brahmā, and this era is called Vaivasvata Manu, because he is the son of Vivasvān. And that Vivasvān is given reference in the Fourth Chapter: imaṁ vivasvate yogaṁ proktavān aham avyayam (BG 4.1). So if you simply calculate the age of Manu it becomes forty millions of years.

So Bhagavad-gītā is not a new theses. It is coming from time immemorial. So Kṛṣṇa is the original preceptor. So here Kṛṣṇa again personally speaking, the authority, personally . . . out of compassion and friendship, love to Arjuna, He's speaking directly to Arjuna. And Arjuna understood Him the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

Paraṁ brahma paraṁ dhāma pavitraṁ paramaṁ bhavān, puruṣam (BG 10.12). Puruṣam. Puruṣam means person. He's not imperson. Imperson is the, another feature of the person. Brahmaṇaḥ ahaṁ pratiṣṭhā. Kṛṣṇa says that, "The brahma-jyotir, impersonal Brahman, that is situated upon Me." Ahaṁ pratiṣṭhā. Just like we are sitting on this platform. This is pratiṣṭhā. Similarly, the brahma-jyotir is situated on the person of Kṛṣṇa.

The person is the ultimate understanding of the Absolute Truth, not the impersonal feature. That is preliminary understanding or imperfect understanding. There is brahma-jyotir. Just like we are experiencing the sunshine. The sunshine is also experience of the sun god, but it is imperfect understanding. It is not perfect understanding. If you want to understand the sun god, then you have to penetrate through the sunshine and reach the sun planet. And then, if . . . you are able to see the predominating deity of the sun planet, whose name is Vivasvān.

Similarly, the whole material creation is a part of the brahma-jyotir. Sarvaṁ khalv idaṁ brahma. So you have to penetrate . . . in the Īśopaniṣad it is said that, requested, it is requesting the . . . that, "You kindly wind up Your brahma-jyotir so can . . . I can see Your face rightly." So ultimately, there is person. Tattva-vastu.

vadanti tat tattva-vidas
tattvaṁ yaj jñānam advayam
brahmeti paramātmeti
bhagavān iti śabdyate
(SB 1.2.11)

This is the version of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam.

So Brahman realization is for the persons who are trying to understand the Absolute Truth by philosophical speculation. That is the understanding. Similarly, the localized Paramātmā feature is realized by the yogīs. Dhyānāvasthita-tad-gatena manasā paśyanti yaṁ yoginaḥ (SB 12.13.1). And the devotees, they realized directly the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Bhagavān, ṣaḍ-aiśvarya bhagavān, with full richness, full reputation, full strength, full knowledge, full renunciation. This is the meaning of Bhagavān. I have already explained. So that Bhagavān is speaking.

So mayy āsakta-manāḥ pārtha (BG 7.1): "Those who have developed attachment for Me, "mayy āsakta, "only attached to Kṛṣṇa . . ." That is Kṛṣṇa consciousness: always thinking of Kṛṣṇa. Mayy āsakta-manāḥ pārtha yogaṁ yuñjan mad-āśrayaḥ. This is yoga. It is already explained by the end of the Sixth Chapter. Yoginām api sarveṣāṁ mad-gatenāntar-ātmanā (BG 6.47). One who has developed attachment for Kṛṣṇa, he has come to perfection simply by developing. And this development of attachment is possible by this arcana-vidhi.

Just like our rising early in the morning, offering maṅgalārātrika, then changing the dress, garlanding, dressing, so many things. From morning, four, to . . . up to night at ten o'clock, there is program. That is real temple worship. Not that the temple is closed whole day and night, and the pūjārī goes for five minutes and bells the bell, again close. No. There is system. Śrī-vigrahārādhana-nitya-nānā-śṛṅgāra-tan-mandira-mār janādau. So, so many activities in temple worship.

So for the kaniṣṭha-adhikārī, neophytes, those who are serious to become, to awaken his attachment for Kṛṣṇa, they must take to this arcana-mārga. This is called arcana-mārga, temple worship. Everyone can establish a small temple in his house, and he can begin family-wise: himself, his wife, his children. That is wanted. This Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement wants to see that every house has become a temple of Kṛṣṇa. That is our program. Mayy āsakta . . . just to increase the attachment for Kṛṣṇa.

That is needed, especially for the gṛhasthas. For the householders . . . still in India, there are many respectable families, they are maintaining a small temple. Therefore Kṛṣṇa says, śucīnāṁ śrīmatāṁ gehe yoga-bhraṣṭo sanjāyate (BG 6.41). Yoga-bhraṣṭa, this yogaṁ yuñjan mad-āśrayaḥ, this bhakti-yoga, one who could not finish the cent percent bhakti-yoga in one life, at least he's guaranteed to have next life as a human being. Because Kṛṣṇa says, śucīnāṁ śrīmatāṁ gehe yoga-bhraṣṭo sanjāyate. Śucīnām. Śucīnām means first-class brāhmin, Vaiṣṇava. They are called śuci. The śuci, the, just the opposite word is muci. Muci means most nasty habit, and śuci means most cleansed habit.

So one poet said that śuci haya muci haya yadi kṛṣṇa tyaje and muci haya śuci haya yadi kṛṣṇa bhaje: "If one becomes Kṛṣṇa conscious, even though he's born in the family of muci, he becomes śuci. And even though one is born in the family of śuci, brāhmin, if he rejects Kṛṣṇa, he becomes muci." So muci haya śuci haya yadi kṛṣṇa bhaje and śuci haya muci haya yadi kṛṣṇa tyaje. This is the . . .

So the highest perfection of life is to awaken our dormant Kṛṣṇa consciousness. That is the highest perfection of life. Everyone has got Kṛṣṇa consciousness dormant. It is covered by the influence of māyā. By the influence of māyā. That is also stated in the Caitanya-caritāmṛta that:

nitya-siddha kṛṣṇa-bhakti 'sādhya' kabhu naya
śravaṇādi-śuddha-citte karaye udaya
(CC Madhya 22.107)

Nitya-siddha. Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and we are all part and parcel of Kṛṣṇa. So therefore our relationship with Kṛṣṇa is natural. It is natural. Just like my part and parcel of the finger; so without finger, my body's imperfect. Finger must be. So the existence of finger with this body, it is natural. Similarly, to remain with Kṛṣṇa, that is our natural position, constitutional position—remain with Kṛṣṇa as cowherd boy, as gopī, as Kṛṣṇa's father, Kṛṣṇa's mother, Kṛṣṇa's servant, Kṛṣṇa's trees, Kṛṣṇa's Yamunā, Kṛṣṇa's flower, Kṛṣṇa's Vṛndāvana land—remain with Kṛṣṇa in any form you like: śānta dāsya sākhya vātsalya mādhurya. In any mellow, humor, you can remain with Kṛṣṇa. That is our natural position.

But when we try to imitate Kṛṣṇa, to become a imitation Kṛṣṇa . . . just like there are so many persons, they say, "I am Kṛṣṇa." This is māyā. Immediately . . . because we trying to forget Kṛṣṇa, our relationship with Kṛṣṇa, immediately māyā captures.

kṛṣṇa bhuliya jīva bhoga vañcha kare
pāśate māyā tāre jāpaṭiyā dhare
(Prema-vivarta)

As soon as we desire to forget Kṛṣṇa, or to rebel against Kṛṣṇa that, "Why I shall serve Kṛṣṇa? I am Kṛṣṇa," immediately māyā is there, side by side. Kṛṣṇa is there. Apaśyat puruṣaṁ pūrṇaṁ māyāṁ ca tad-apāśrayam. When Vyāsadeva, after getting instruction from Nārada, he wanted to write Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, so he first of all meditated. Bhakti-yogena manasi, apaśyat puruṣaṁ pūrṇaṁ māyāṁ ca tad-apāśrayam (SB 1.7.4). He saw both Kṛṣṇa and His illusory energy, apāśrayam, on the back side.

So Kṛṣṇa is never influenced by the illusory energy, māyā. We become influenced by the māyā. Kṛṣṇa . . . just like cloud. Cloud cannot cover the sun. It is our eyes which are covered by the cloud. We see . . . we say that: "Now the sun is covered by the cloud." No, that is not the fact. Sun is very, very big. Sun cannot be covered by cloud. It is our eyes which are covered by the cloud. Similarly, māyā . . . we are teeny part and parcel of Kṛṣṇa. Therefore we are covered by māyā. Sometimes, not always. Kṛṣṇa . . . when we forget Kṛṣṇa,

kṛṣṇa-bahirmukha hañā bhoga vāñchā kare
nikaṭa-stha māyā tāre jāpaṭiyā dhare
(Prema-vivarta)

As soon as we try to forget Kṛṣṇa, immediately māyā is there.

Therefore the reversing process, reversing process, if we want to go back again to Kṛṣṇa, then daivī hy eṣā guṇamayī mama māyā duratyayā (BG 7.14). You cannot go back to home, back to Godhead, by your own speculation. That is not possible. Ciraṁ vicinvan. You can go on speculating to become one with God. That is another thing. But if you actually want to know God and see God, then as Kṛṣṇa says, mām eva ye prapadyante māyām etāṁ taranti te (BG 7.14): simply surrender to Kṛṣṇa and māyā will give you no more trouble. You can see Kṛṣṇa. This is the process.

Therefore Kṛṣṇa says, mayy āsakta-manāḥ pārtha yogam. To . . . this is yoga system. It is called bhakti-yoga. Bhakti-yoga system. So a neophyte devotee should be engaged in temple worship, but if he does not make further improvement, if he sticks to the simply temple worship, then he remains a kaniṣṭha-adhikārī, lower-standard devotee. Lower-standard devotee. But one has to become first-standard devotee; at least, one must . . . a first-standard devotee is very high position, spiritual position. But at least we must come to the second standard. The lower standard is:

arcāyām eva haraye
pūjāṁ yaḥ śraddhayehate
na tad-bhakteṣu cānyeṣu
sa bhaktaḥ prākṛtaḥ smṛtaḥ
(SB 11.2.47)

Arcā, this arcā-vigraha, Deity, Kṛṣṇa, arcāyām eva haraye, the Deity of Kṛṣṇa, yaḥ pūjāṁ śraddhayā īhate, with great devotion and according to the rules and regulation, if one performs, that is very nice. But if he does not improve, na tad-bhakteṣu cānyeṣu, he does not become knowable to the devotees and other persons, then he remains a kaniṣṭha-adhikārī. Sa bhaktaḥ prākṛtaḥ. Prākṛta means in the material platform. He does not actually promoted to the spiritual platform if he simply remains.

Therefore along with the worship of Kṛṣṇa in the temple, this hearing should be. Śravaṇaṁ kīrtanam (SB 7.5.23). Just like we are doing. We do not engage only the devotees to the temple worship, but there must be program for hearing Bhagavad-gītā, Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, the science of God. Otherwise, after some time, simply if you ring the bell, after time you'll be disgusted and the whole thing will be lost, as it has become now in India. There was no instruction about Kṛṣṇa consciousness; they simply attached to the temple and belling. And now it is now zero. Devotion is zero.

So two things must go on, parallel. Then if we . . . two things must go, then you are promoted to the second platform, madhyama-adhikārī. Madhyama-adhikārī means at that time he sees four things:

īśvare tad-adhīneṣu
bāliśeṣu dviṣatsu ca
prema-maitrī-kṛpopekṣā
yaḥ karoti sa madhyamaḥ
(SB 11.2.46)

Madhyama. Īśvara. By arcana-vidhi, he understands Kṛṣṇa, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, by this process, by the regulative process, by the instruction of the spiritual master, by the regulative principles set up in the bhakti-śāstras, just like Nārada Pañcarātra, Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu. There are many. So at that time, if one comes from the lower platform to the . . .

Of course, we must know that any devotee, either in the lower platform or in the second platform or on the first platform, they are to be considered as devotees. Not that because one is in the material platform, he's not devotee. He is also devotee. But he has to improve.

The improvement means he must know what is Kṛṣṇa. Simply if he remains attached to the temple worship and does not try to understand who is a Kṛṣṇa devotee and how he has to deal with others . . . na tad-bhakteṣu cānyeṣu. We have got some duty to others. This is preaching work. This is preaching work. One should not be satisfied simply by worshiping in the temple. Then he'll remain a neophyte. He must become a preacher, Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Then he comes to the second platform.

So when he becomes a preacher he sees four things. He sees God, Kṛṣṇa, Īśvara; tad-adhīna, and the devotees. Tad-adhīna means those who have accepted Kṛṣṇa as the parama-puruṣa. There is another verse in the Śrīmad-Bhāgavata: itthaṁ brahma-sukhānubhūtyā dāsyaṁ gatānāṁ para-daivatena. Dāsyaṁ gatānām, for the bhaktas, Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme Lord, Paradeva.

itthaṁ brahma-sukhānubhūtyā
dāsyaṁ gatānāṁ para-daivatena
māyāśritānāṁ nara-dārakeṇa
sākaṁ vijahruḥ kṛta-puṇya-puñjāḥ
(SB 10.12.11)

When Śukadeva Gosvāmī described the cowherd boys playing with Kṛṣṇa . . . so he is remarking that, "These boys who are playing with Kṛṣṇa . . . who is this Kṛṣṇa?" Itthaṁ brahma-sukhānubhūtyā. Those, those who are impersonalists, those who are attached to the impersonal brahma-jyotir, for them, He is the target. He is the target. From Him, the brahma-jyotir comes. Itthaṁ satāṁ brahma-sukhānubhūtyā. And dāsyaṁ gatānāṁ para-daivatena: "And those who are devotees, for them, here is the Supreme Lord." Dāsyaṁ gatānāṁ para-daivatena.

And māyāśritānāṁ nara-dārakeṇa: "And those who are under the influence of māyā, for them, He's ordinary human child." The same person, different views. One is seeing that the ultimate target of brahma-jyotir, and somebody is seeing that He is the Supreme Lord, and somebody's seeing, "He's ordinary boy." So Kṛṣṇa is visioned under different position. Under different position. But He's the Supreme Lord.

So this yoga system, attachment for Kṛṣṇa, begins from the temple worship and ends into mahā-bhāgavata. Mahā-bhāgavata means who simply sees Kṛṣṇa, nothing . . . sarvatra sphūrati haya iṣṭa-deva. Sthāvara-jaṅgama dekhe nā dekhe tāra mūrti (CC Madhya 8.274). Similarly, in the Bhagavad-gītā also:

vidyā-vinaya-sampanne
brāhmaṇe gavi hastini
śuni caiva śva-pāke ca
paṇḍitāḥ sama-darśinaḥ
(BG 5.18)

He does not see anything but Kṛṣṇa. A mahā-bhāgavata, when a tree . . . when he sees a tree, he does not see the form of the tree, but he sees Kṛṣṇa. That is mahā-bhāgavata. That we should not imitate. That is the highest stage, perfectional stage. But at least we come to the middle stage. What is that middle stage? To . . .

We must understand what is God, what is Kṛṣṇa. Perfect understanding. And tad-adhīna, and His devotees. Īśvare tad-adhīneṣu bāliśa. Bāliśa means innocent person. They are un . . . I mean to . . . they do not know actually what is God. And dviṣat. Dviṣat means envious. The four classes of men: God, His devotee, innocent person and envious person, demons.

So the person who is promoted to the second stage, he'll deal with these four classes of division differently. Īśvara-prema. One should try to learn how to love Kṛṣṇa. Yato bhaktir adhokṣaje (SB 1.2.6). That is first class. And tad . . . īśvare tad-adhīneṣu bāliśeṣu dviṣatsu ca, prema, prema, love for Kṛṣṇa, and maitrī, and to make friendship with the devotees. Prema-maitrī. And kṛpā: those who are innocent, one should be merciful. The devotee should be merciful, just to awaken their Kṛṣṇa consciousness.

And dviṣatsu ca upekṣāḥ: and those who are envious, they should be rejected. These four classes . . . to try to love Kṛṣṇa, to make friendship with devotees, and to give some service to the innocent public who does not know what is God, and those who are envious, asuras, they should be rejected. The madhyama-adhikārī should not touch the demons, because maybe he may turn again, be demon. Therefore one should be very careful to associate with the demons.

But when one becomes uttama-adhikārī, mahā-bhāgavata, he does not see anyone as demon. He sees, "Everyone is worshiping Kṛṣṇa. I am not worshiping." This is mahā-bhāgavata. Just like Rādhārāṇī. Rādhārāṇī always feels that "I do not know how to love Kṛṣṇa. Oh, he . . . here is a gopī. How she loves Kṛṣṇa." That is Her . . . this is called mahā-bhāva.

So we should not imitate Rādhārāṇī. Caitanya Mahāprabhu . . . just like Caitanya Mahāprabhu, He's the symbol of Rādhārāṇī's mahā-bhāva. He says that "I do not love Kṛṣṇa. I do not know how to love Kṛṣṇa." Then if you . . . somebody, if somebody says: "Then why You are crying?" "Well, that is a show. I am making a show. I am crying." Then what is the symptom? "The symptom is that if I would have loved Kṛṣṇa, then without Him I have died long, long ago. I should have died. I am living still without Kṛṣṇa, that means I do not love Kṛṣṇa." This is mahā-bhāgavata-bhāva, separation.

āśliṣya vā pāda-ratāṁ pinaṣṭu mām
marma-hatāṁ karotu vā adarśanān
yathā tathā vā vidadhātu lampaṭo
mat-prāṇa-nāthas tu sa eva nāparaḥ
(CC Antya 20.47)

This is mahā-bhāgavata. So mahā-bhāgavata, we should not imitate. But we should not remain also as kaniṣṭha-adhikārī. We must come to the madhyama-adhikārī, middle stage. So these stages will be manifest gradually if we simply try to develop our attachment for Kṛṣṇa.

So this is the beginning: arcā, arcanam. Śravaṇaṁ kīrtanaṁ viṣṇoḥ smaraṇaṁ pāda-sevanam arcanam (SB 7.5.23). Arcanam. Therefore for every gṛhastha . . . because gṛhasthas are busy in so many ways, they have no opportunity to preach. But they must take to arcana. Every house, every householder, they must . . . what is the difficulty?

Just like we have got in this platform, Deity of Rādhā-Kṛṣṇa, everyone can install Rādhā-Kṛṣṇa Deity at home and under the instruction of spiritual master and śāstric regulations. Then if we engage ourselves in arcana-vidhi, then automatically, all the anomalies of life will stop. Ādau śraddhā tataḥ sādhu-saṅgo 'tha bhajana-kriyā (CC Madhya 23.14-15). This arcana-vidhi is one of the items of bhajana, bhajana-kriyā.

So anartha-nivṛttiḥ syāt. If every house engages in this arcana-vidhi, so many unwanted things will vanish. You'll have no more interest for seeing cinema or going to the restaurant or smoking biḍi and wasting time by unnecessary talks. So many things. Then your life will be perfect. So many nonsense things will go automatically. Anartha-nivṛttiḥ syāt. So therefore to become Kṛṣṇa conscious, every house, everywhere, every person, every human being should adopt this arcana-vidhi. Then at least he will save so many unnecessary . . . anartha-nivṛttiḥ syāt. Ādau śraddhā tataḥ sādhu-saṅgaḥ (CC Madhya 23.14-15).

So Kṛṣṇa says that mayy āsakta-manāḥ pārtha: "My dear Arjuna . . ." Arjuna is addressed here as "Pārtha," very familial. Because Pārtha, Kṛṣṇa . . . Arjuna's mother's name was Pṛthā, Kuntī's name. So . . . and Pṛthā, Kuntī, happened to be the aunt of Kṛṣṇa. So He's very feelingly, in a familial way, He's addressing, "Pārtha." "My dear Arjuna, Pārtha," mayy āsakta-manāḥ, "simply by increasing attachment for Me," mayy āsakta, mayy āsakta-manāḥ pārtha yogam . . . this is yoga. This is perfect yoga. Yoginām api sarve . . . mad-āśrayaḥ. "This yoga system should be executed directly under My direction, or under the direction of a representative of Mine."

The spiritual master is the representative of Kṛṣṇa. How he becomes representative? What is the test? The test is . . . just like anyone can understand, representative. Suppose a business firm's representative is going to canvass for business, what is his business? He will take the interest of the firm, not his personal interest. He will try to secure business for the firm he's working, not for his personal . . . that is perfect representative. And if he goes, in the name of the firm's representative, and he does his own business, then he's a liar.

Similarly, Kṛṣṇa's representative means one who speaks about Kṛṣṇa as Kṛṣṇa speaks. And if he adulterates, he's a liar; he's not representative. He's not representative. Kṛṣṇa says, man-manā bhava mad-bhakto mad-yājī māṁ namaskuru (BG 18.65), and if the representative says: "Just become a devotee of Kṛṣṇa. Just worship Kṛṣṇa. Just offer your obeisances to Kṛṣṇa," he is representative.

Kṛṣṇa says, sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja (BG 18.66), and the representative will say that, "You give up all other process. You simply surrender to Kṛṣṇa." He will never say that, "I am Kṛṣṇa." He'll never say. He's not representative of Kṛṣṇa. He's a liar. He's not representative.

So to become representative of Kṛṣṇa is not very difficult. Simply one has to become very sincere. That's all. That whatever Kṛṣṇa says, he will say. Just like Arjuna accepted: sarvam etad ṛtaṁ manye yad vadasi keśava (BG 10.14). That is representative. "My dear Keśava, Kṛṣṇa, whatever You are speaking, I accept them all, in toto, without any reformation." That is representative of Kṛṣṇa. Caitanya Mahāprabhu said:

āmāra ājñāya guru hañā tāra' ei deśa
yāre dekha tāre kaha 'kṛṣṇa'-upadeśa
(CC Madhya 7.128)

Āmāra ājñāya. One has to carry out the order of God. He is representative. Otherwise liar, misnomer. So therefore Kṛṣṇa says, mad-āśrayaḥ. Mad-āśrayaḥ: "Either under My direction, the direction is there, or My representative's." Mat. Mad-āśrayaḥ means "either under My direction or one who has taken . . ."

(break) . . . we have discussed. But gāyatrī-mantra is the beginning of brahminical culture because without attaining the brahminical qualification, nobody can understand Vedic literature. Therefore a brāhmin, initiated, he's given the gāyatrī-mantra. So that is required. (break)

Indian man: Hare Kṛṣṇa. Your Divine Grace, in order to understand Śrī Bhagavān Kṛṣṇa, we have to take your help, as you said you can explain what are the words of Lord Kṛṣṇa. And in order to understand yourself we have, or we had to take the help of so many other persons.

You speak in English and Sanskrit or Hindi, and at college and at school, so many teachers taught us Sanskrit, Hindi, and history, geography—because there are so many illustrations in your speech also. Then guru has been defined like this:

ajñāna-timirāndhasya
jñānāñjana-śalākayā
cakṣur unmīlitaṁ yena
tasmai śrī-gurave namaḥ
(Garuḍa Purāṇa)

Ajñāna timirāndhasya. About jñāna, nothing has been said whether it is spiritual jñāna or material jñāna. So in order to understanding you and, through yourself, also Kṛṣṇa, all these so-called gurus, or, I may say, teachers, they have contributed towards understanding or developing Kṛṣṇa consciousness.

Now, leaving aside these material teachers, I am taking the, taking one spiritual guru who gave me Kṛṣṇa consciousness first and who taught me to worship God, Kṛṣṇa, and to maintain a temple at my own house and to learn the ślokas from Gītā or the Śrīmad-Bhāgavata. And I have learned by rote the grandness of adhyāyas of Bhāgavatam and the Gītā. But, you see, I could not understand anything.

Now, after going through your literature, complete literatures, now the whole light has come to me, and I have been able to understand even that the guru who gave me such Kṛṣṇa consciousness. I don't challenge or question the other findings of their guru. Just like a boy who absent from class, not attending the class, there is no fault of the guru. Guru has been attending his lectures. But I am truant. I am not attending class. So, you see, I can't blame that guru. But now I have understood everything from Your Grace, and now that ajñāna has been removed. I have now become more Kṛṣṇa conscious than before.

So should I give credit to all those gurus who have helped me to understand? Or should I now select, or should I exercise any choice that I should accept this guru or that guru only? So that doubt should be cleared.

Prabhupāda: Hmm. Guru is only one. Guru means, as you explained:

ajñāna-timirāndhasya
jñānāñjana-śalākayā
cakṣur unmīlitaṁ yena
tasmai śrī-gurave namaḥ
(Garuḍa Purāṇa)

One who eradicates the ajñāna, andhakāra, darkness. In the darkness, if somebody brings lamp, ajñāna-timirāndhasya jñānāñjana-śalākayā . . . the jñāna-rūpa, torchlight, he's guru. So maybe different degrees, but anyone who opens the spiritual eyes, he's guru. So . . .

But in the śāstra it is said, gurur api kāryākāryakam ajānataḥ. If I accept some guru, but if later on it appears that he did not know what is to be done, what is to be not to be done, then Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī says that such guru: parityāgo vidhīyate. Such guru should be rejected. But it doesn't matter that degree. Actually, if the guru teaches Kṛṣṇa consciousness, then he may be in lesser degree, but he's accepted as guru. There is no question of rejection.

Because Kṛṣṇa is actually jñāna. One who teaches Kṛṣṇa as the Supreme Personality of Godhead, "One has to know Kṛṣṇa, one has to surrender to Kṛṣṇa," this kind of teaching is required. And if the guru says that, "I am Kṛṣṇa. Everyone is Kṛṣṇa," then, "daridra-kṛṣṇa, daridra-nārāyaṇa," he is not a guru. He's not a guru. He's misguiding. Misguiding. Avaiṣṇavo gurur na syāt. This is the śāstric injunction.

Ṣaṭ-karma-nipuṇo vipro mantra-tantra-viśāradaḥ. A . . . generally, a qualified brāhmin becomes guru. That is natural. brāhmin is the head of the society. So he is . . . and without becoming brāhmin, nobody can become guru. That is also fact. Because brāhmin means brahma jānātīti brāhmanaḥ, one who knows Brahman, Brahman. So guru must be a brāhmin, mean a qualified brāhmin, not born-brāhmin, so-called brāhmin. Qualified brāhmin.

So still, brāhmin's qualification, ṣaṭ-karma: paṭhana pāṭhana yajana yājana dāna pratigraha. So śāstra says that ṣaṭ-karma-nipuṇo vipraḥ. If one vipra is quite expert in executing the six kinds of business, and mantra-tantra-viśāradaḥ, and very well known in the Vedic mantras and hymns and everything complete, but if he is avaiṣṇava, if he is not Vaiṣṇava, he does not know viṣṇu-tattva, or kṛṣṇa-tattva, then he cannot become spiritual master.

Avaiṣṇavo gurur na syād vaiṣṇavaḥ śva-paco guruḥ. But if a Vaiṣṇava, one who knows viṣṇu-tattva, kṛṣṇa-tattva, even if he's born in the family of śva-paca, the dog-eaters, caṇḍāla, he can be accepted as guru.

So the real test is whether the guru is a Vaiṣṇava, whether he knows the science of Kṛṣṇa. That is also confirmed by Caitanya Mahāprabhu:

kibā vipra, kibā śūdra, nyāsī kene naya
yei kṛṣṇa-tattva-vettā sei 'guru' haya
(CC Madhya 8.128)

A . . . it doesn't matter what he is, whether he's a sannyāsī or a gṛhastha or a brāhmin or a su . . . born in brāhmin family or . . . it doesn't matter. Yei kṛṣṇa-tattva. Anyone who knows Kṛṣṇa, he can become guru, not others. So that is the statement of the śāstras. Avaiṣṇava cannot become guru.

Indian man: In your presence I may declare also attending I have found your system of Kṛṣṇa consciousness the best and very practical. Because I, I am a . . .

Prabhupāda: Hare Kṛṣṇa. (break) (end)